Oil prices fall as Trump rules out Iran attack before US elections

Oil prices fell on Friday after US President Donald Trump said Washington would not attack Iran before the November 3 midterm elections, easing fears of further disruptions to global energy supplies amid negotiations to end the conflict.

Brent crude futures fell $1.37, or 1.3%, to $102.91 a barrel by 0450 GMT, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures declined $1.09, or 1.2%, to $90.40, Reuters reported.

The decline followed a sharp rally on Thursday, when Brent settled about 4% higher as attacks on oil-shipping routes in the Middle East heightened concerns over supplies. Despite Friday’s retreat, Brent remained on course for a weekly gain, while WTI was headed for a slight weekly decline.

Trump said on Thursday that Washington was holding “productive discussions” with Tehran and that the United States would not launch an attack before the November elections. His comments followed reports that the administration had been considering military action against Iran.

The easing in prices reflects a shift in market expectations rather than a resolution of the conflict. Oil traders remain concerned about the security of shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global energy supplies.

Strait of Hormuz remains a major supply risk

Iran’s Tasnim news agency reported that Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran was reviewing the US response to an Iranian proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days.

Before the war, the strategic waterway carried shipments equivalent to about 20% of global oil and fuel supplies. Increased threats to shipping in the Gulf and the strait have contributed to sharp price swings in recent weeks.

Any sustained improvement in negotiations and maritime security could ease pressure on crude prices. However, analysts have cautioned that diplomatic statements alone are insufficient to guarantee a recovery in energy flows.

“The prospect of easing tensions still needs to be reinforced by concrete progress in negotiations and improvements in shipping safety through the Strait of Hormuz,” said Linh Tran, an analyst at XS.com.

Washington is continuing economic pressure on Tehran despite the diplomatic activity. The United States imposed fresh sanctions on Thursday targeting individuals, networks and 17 vessels accused of transporting Iranian crude oil, petroleum products and petrochemicals.

The combination of negotiations, sanctions and security threats has left markets sensitive to announcements from Washington and Tehran.

China fuel exports and US hurricane add to market uncertainty

Developments outside the Middle East are also influencing the outlook for energy prices.

China, the world’s largest oil importer, is expected to resume refined-fuel exports after a temporary halt during its Golden Week holiday. The move could ease tight supplies of diesel, gasoline and jet fuel in international markets.

The International Energy Agency has also agreed to accelerate the release of oil stocks under a plan launched in March, with priority given to diesel supplies.

Meanwhile, Hurricane Isaias is disrupting US oil production in the Gulf of Mexico. Producers had shut in about 1.3 million barrels per day, equivalent to 62.9% of current production in the affected area, as of Thursday, according to the US Marine Minerals Administration.

The disruption could support prices if production recovery is delayed, although the duration of the impact will depend on post-storm inspections and the speed at which facilities resume operations.

For India, a sustained decline in crude prices could ease the country’s import bill and reduce some inflationary pressure. However, Friday’s fall alone does not establish a lasting downward trend, particularly while Brent remains above $100 a barrel and geopolitical risks continue to threaten supplies.

The direction of prices will depend on whether US-Iran negotiations produce tangible progress, shipping through the Strait of Hormuz becomes safer and disrupted production and fuel exports recover.

For now, the market is balancing hopes of diplomatic de-escalation against continuing risks to global energy supplies.

Reuters/Ipsos figures show Trump’s approval rate falling to 32% from Jan 25 rating of 47%

President Donald Trump’s approval rating has fallen to 32%, the lowest level of his political career, according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll. The figure marks a 15-point decline from the 47% approval recorded shortly after his second inauguration in January 2025, with economic concerns and the war with Iran emerging as major issues in the latest survey.

Approval Erodes From Second-Inauguration High

The latest reading extends a broader decline in Trump’s approval rating over the past 18 months, despite brief periods of recovery. The Reuters/Ipsos figures show his approval moving as follows:

  • January 2025: 47% shortly after his second inauguration
  • March 2026: 36%
  • August 2026: 33%, matching his previous first-term low
  • September 14, 2026: 35%
  • September 21, 2026: 32%

At 32%, Trump’s current approval rating is three points below former President Joe Biden’s lowest Reuters/Ipsos rating of 35%, recorded in October 2024.

The latest decline also extends to Trump’s Republican base. His approval among Republicans fell from 82% to 73% in a week, according to the poll.

Cost of Living Emerges as Key Pressure Point

Economic concerns are particularly pronounced in the latest survey. Only 17% of Americans approve of Trump’s handling of the cost of living, while even among Republicans, 51% disapprove of his performance on the issue compared with 44% who approve.

The war with Iran is another area where the administration faces weak public support. Just 34% of respondents approve of the US strikes on Iran, while 82% expect the conflict to continue for an extended period. The conflict has also coincided with higher fuel prices, adding to concerns about household costs.

Trump retains substantially stronger support on immigration. Seventy-nine per cent of Republicans approve of his handling of the issue, although approval falls to 36% among Americans overall. His handling of crime receives 35% approval nationally, compared with 50% who disapprove.

The political impact is also visible in the generic congressional ballot. Democratic candidates lead Republican candidates 43% to 35% among respondents, an eight-point gap that represents the largest Democratic advantage recorded by Reuters/Ipsos this year.

The poll does not establish that economic concerns or the Iran conflict alone are responsible for the shift in voting preferences. It does, however, show that Trump’s overall approval has declined alongside weak ratings on several issues that are central to his second-term agenda, while Democratic candidates currently hold an eight-point advantage on the generic congressional ballot.