A century after WWI, 9,909 forgotten Indian soldiers finally get their place in history

More than a century after the guns of the First World War fell silent, nearly 10,000 Indian soldiers whose deaths went unrecognised in official records have finally been restored to history, correcting what historians describe as a long-standing injustice rooted in the colonial era.

The Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) has added the names of 9,909 soldiers from pre-Partition India to its official casualty records after a five-year effort to trace missing servicemen who died during the 1914-18 conflict but were never formally commemorated.

The breakthrough came through the Punjab Registers Project, a collaboration between the CWGC, the UK Punjab Heritage Association and the University of Greenwich, which examined fragile archival records preserved at Lahore Museum.

Researchers digitised and analysed registers containing details of around 320,000 Punjabi recruits before cross-checking thousands of entries against existing CWGC records. The exercise revealed that 9,909 Indian soldiers who died during the war had been omitted from official commemoration.

The CWGC said the omission stemmed from policies of the British Indian government, which denied war graves status to many soldiers who died in non-operational areas within India during the conflict. As a result, their names were never forwarded to the commission for inclusion in its records.

“More than a century after the end of the First World War, our mission endures, ensuring all those who died in the service of the Commonwealth receive the commemoration they deserve,” CWGC Director General Claire Horton said.

She described the project as a landmark effort that restores missing chapters of both family and global history, adding that the commission would continue working with Commonwealth governments on plans for a memorial honouring the newly recognised soldier.

For descendants, the discovery means different

Leicester-based dentist Dr Inder Singh Palahey said his family’s knowledge of his great-grandfather Kesar Singh had been limited to stories passed down through generations.

“From just hearsay to now discovering the facts about my great-grandfather’s ultimate military sacrifice… has been incredibly poignant,” he said, adding that official recognition acknowledges the sacrifices made not only by the soldier but also by the family he left behind.

Former England rugby international Manjinder Nagra also discovered that her maternal great-grandfather, Jagat Singh, was among those omitted from the records.

She said learning that he would now be officially recognised was “incredibly moving”, adding that the acknowledgement finally gives her family the honour and dignity they had waited more than 100 years to see.

The scale of India’s contribution to the First World War has often been overshadowed despite more than 1.4 million men from the British Indian Army serving across Europe, Africa and the Middle East. One in every six soldiers fighting for Britain during the war came from pre-Partition India, with Punjab alone contributing nearly half a million Sikh, Muslim, Hindu and Christian servicemen.

Historian Amandeep Madra, chair of the UK Punjab Heritage Association, said the project was about restoring names that should never have disappeared from history.

“These men were excluded not because they did not serve, but because of decisions taken a century ago. Correcting the record gives families around the world back a vital part of their history,” he said.

The research team, including University of Greenwich PhD researcher George Williams and 19 volunteers, reviewed 15,935 deaths and compared them with more than 74,000 existing CWGC Indian Army records before confirming the missing casualties.

The project forms part of the CWGC’s Non-Commemoration Programme, launched in 2021 to identify those excluded from official remembrance. So far, the initiative has uncovered more than 20,000 previously uncommemorated names, with the latest findings representing one of its most significant discoveries.

For a better ‘I,’ there needs to be a supportive ‘we’

If you’re one of those lucky individuals with high motivation and who actively pursues personal growth goals, thank your family and friends who support you.

People who view their relationships as supportive may confidently strive for growth, new University of Michigan research shows.

U-M researchers used data from samples from the United States and Japan to determine if personal growth is an outcome of an individual’s traits or the positive relationships they have with others.

In Study 1, about 200 participants were randomly assigned to one of three relationship conditions: supportive, nonsupportive and neutral. In the two main conditions, some had to consider a person in their life with whom they felt comfortable (or not) and did not worry (did worry) about being abandoned by them. The neutral group had to consider an acquaintance for whom they did not have strong feelings.

Participants read a hypothetical scenario in which they had to choose between a higher-paying job with high familiarity (Company A) or a lower-paying job that required learning that would help their long-term career development (Company B).

Among those in the supportive relationship condition, 65 percent selected Company B, whereas 40 percent of those in the nonsupportive condition chose the same company. Fifty percent of the neutral group picked Company B.

Participants who thought about a supportive person were more willing to choose a job that promoted personal growth, even at lower pay, in part because they had more self-confidence, the study indicated.

Studies 2 and 3 analyzed people’s perceptions of the support received from family and friends to determine personal growth tendencies in two cultures.

Using data from the Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, more than 3,800 participants in Study 2 rated the support received from family and friends. The questions included: “How much does your family (do your friends) really care about you?” and “How much can you open up to them if you need to talk about your worries?” They also rated their willingness to develop their potential and grow as a person, as well as self-confidence.

People who reported their relationships to be supportive had a greater willingness to grow personally and felt more self-confident, the study showed. The results were similar in the data from the Survey of Midlife Development in Japan, which sampled about 1,000 people.

“The more supportive people judged their relationships to be, the higher their personal growth tendencies, even in a culture that puts more emphasis on the collective rather than the individual,” said David Lee, the study’s lead author who obtained his doctorate in psychology at U-M.

Overall, the findings support the “I-through-We” perspective, which means the social tendency to connect with others, and the individual tendency to strive and grow as individuals, are not mutually exclusive and may augment and magnify each other.

“In other words, relationships do not necessarily conflict with but help sustain one’s personal growth,” said Oscar Ybarra, U-M professor of psychology and of management and organizations.

The findings thus address both the importance of distinguishing yourself from others by fulfilling personal goals, but also being a good group member by fulfilling social obligations and cultivating supportive relationships.

“Building positive social connections with others should put people in a good position to receive social support that is instrumental to personal growth, as well as allowing people to strike a balance between two fundamental values: to strive and connect,” said Lee, who is now a postdoctoral fellow at Ohio State University.