India Expands 10 Plastic Parks With 50% Grant to Boost Polymer Sector

India is accelerating the development of its polymer-based industrial ecosystem through the expansion of Plastic Parks, aimed at strengthening domestic plastic manufacturing, attracting investment, and promoting sustainable practices. The initiative, overseen by the Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals, is being implemented under the New Scheme of Petrochemicals.

As part of the scheme, the government supports the creation of industrial clusters—termed Plastic Parks—by providing up to 50% of the project cost as grant-in-aid, with a maximum cap of ₹40 crore per project. These parks are designed to offer state-of-the-art infrastructure and shared facilities to consolidate the capacities of the downstream plastic processing industry.

So far, 10 Plastic Parks have been approved across various states including Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Assam, Tamil Nadu, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, and Uttar Pradesh. Parks in Gorakhpur (UP) and Ganjimutt (Karnataka) were the latest to be greenlit in 2022. These hubs are not only intended to drive production and exports but also play a significant role in managing plastic waste through built-in recycling and waste treatment facilities.

According to government data, more than ₹258 crore has been released for Plastic Parks since 2013, with significant investment drawn to projects in states such as Tamil Nadu and Madhya Pradesh. The parks are managed by Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) set up by state governments, who also facilitate private sector participation through incentives and awareness programs.

The move aligns with India’s growing footprint in the global plastic trade. The country ranked 12th globally in plastic exports in 2022, up from 8.2 million thousand USD in 2014 to 27 million thousand USD, according to World Bank estimates.

In tandem with industrial expansion, the government is placing a strong emphasis on environmental sustainability. Plastic Parks are equipped with recycling sheds, effluent treatment plants, and hazardous waste management systems. The initiative is supported by Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations and bans on specific single-use plastics.

To support innovation, the Department has also established 13 Centres of Excellence (CoEs) at leading research institutions such as IIT Delhi, IIT Guwahati, and CIPET Bhubaneswar. These CoEs focus on sustainable polymer research, bio-engineered materials, and advanced polymer applications.

Additionally, the Central Institute of Petrochemical Engineering and Technology (CIPET) is offering a range of training programs to equip the workforce with the skills needed in the evolving plastics sector.

With continued focus on sustainability, innovation, and global competitiveness, the Plastic Parks initiative is poised to play a pivotal role in India’s ambition to become a major global hub for polymer production and environmentally responsible plastic processing.

India’s Index of Industrial Production Records Growth of 2.9% in February 2025

The Quick Estimates of the Index of Industrial Production (IIP) for February 2025 show a growth rate of 2.9%. This is a decrease from the 5.0% growth recorded in January 2025. The IIP is an important indicator of the industrial performance of the country, and these estimates are compiled based on data received from various source agencies, which collect information from factories and establishments.

In February 2025, the growth rates for the three main sectors of the economy are as follows: Mining at 1.6%, Manufacturing at 2.9%, and Electricity at 3.6%. The overall IIP stands at 151.3, which is an increase from 147.1 in February 2024. The indices for the Mining, Manufacturing, and Electricity sectors are 141.9, 148.6, and 194.0, respectively.

Within the manufacturing sector, 14 out of 23 industry groups have shown positive growth compared to February 2024. The top contributors to this growth include the “Manufacture of basic metals” with a growth of 5.8%, “Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers” at 8.9%, and “Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products” at 8.0%. Specific items within these groups, such as flat products of alloy steel, auto components, and various types of cement, have significantly contributed to this growth.

According to the use-based classification, the indices for February 2025 are as follows: 152.3 for Primary Goods, 115.5 for Capital Goods, 159.9 for Intermediate Goods, and 191.3 for Infrastructure/Construction Goods. The growth rates for these categories compared to February 2024 are 2.8% for Primary Goods, 8.2% for Capital Goods, 1.5% for Intermediate Goods, 6.6% for Infrastructure/Construction Goods, 3.8% for Consumer Durables, and a decline of 2.1% for Consumer Non-Durables. The main contributors to the growth of IIP this month are Infrastructure/Construction Goods, Primary Goods, and Capital Goods.

The Quick Estimates for February 2025 have been compiled with a weighted response rate of 89%. Additionally, the indices for January 2025 have undergone the first revision, while those for November 2024 have been finalized based on updated data. The response rates for these revisions are 94% for January and 95% for November.

 

Trump’s Surprise Tariff Pause Spares China; India Welcomes Relief

US President Donald Trump has announced a pause on the implementation of most of his reciprocal tariffs. He explained the decision by saying that people were “getting yippy and a little bit afraid.”

The pause lowers tariffs to 10 per cent and applies to imports from all trading partner countries that have not imposed retaliatory levies on American goods. This includes over 75 countries that have opted to negotiate with the administration, such as India, which is currently in talks with the US over a Bilateral Trade Agreement.

However, China stands out as a major exception to this sudden shift. In response to China’s retaliatory levy of 84 per cent on American goods, Trump has increased tariffs on Chinese imports to a staggering 125 per cent. The announcement, made via a post on Truth Social, rattled already-volatile markets. Yet, in a dramatic turnaround, markets surged shortly afterward, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq soaring to a two-decade high.

Trump’s decision to halt most tariffs reportedly caught even his own officials off guard. When asked about the abrupt policy reversal, Trump repeated that people were getting “yippie and a little bit afraid,” adding, “You have to be flexible,” when pressed further.

Trump’s Tariff Reversal and Market Reactions

Despite early declarations from top aides that the levies were non-negotiable, Trump had signaled a willingness to negotiate when first introducing the tariffs. He moved ahead with the pause on Wednesday morning.

Since the reciprocal tariffs went into effect, US markets have been in turmoil. Calls for a 90-day pause have come from key Wall Street voices, including Bill Ackman. Trump has also encountered pushback from key advisor Elon Musk, who criticized the tariffs and engaged in a public spat with Peter Navarro, one of the President’s main trade advisors.

Following the announcement, Asian markets rebounded significantly. Japan’s Nikkei share average surged as investors scooped up battered stocks, echoing gains on Wall Street, where the S&P 500 jumped 9.5%—its biggest daily gain since 2008. Analysts at Morgan Stanley described Trump’s move as bullish for Asian equities, and especially so for Japanese stocks.

EU, China in Talks

Meanwhile, the European Union has called for restraint. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the importance of avoiding further escalation in a phone call with Chinese Premier Li Qiang. In response, China expressed confidence in its ability to weather the economic pressure.

In India, markets unsettled by recent tariff news may find relief in the pause. The decision also gives New Delhi a window to finalize its deal with the US and prepare for any future tariff actions. India has not retaliated against Trump’s 26 per cent levy and has remained engaged in negotiations, as have nearly 70 other nations.

The tariff pause has also prompted Goldman Sachs Group economists to retract a recent recession forecast. Initially projecting a 65% chance of a recession within 12 months due to the tariffs, they have since reverted to their earlier baseline prediction of no recession following Trump’s announcement.

After tariffs, what’s Trump’s next Move? Watch out US dollar weakening

As the dust begins to settle down on President Donald Trump’s latest tariffs, speculation is growing over his next move. With the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, Trump has powerful tools to pressure allies—credit access, dollar funding, and payment systems, which may be wielded as powerful weapons to subject compliance from foes and allies together.

Deploying these weapons would carry major risks for the U.S. economy and could backfire, but some experts warn they remain on the table if tariffs fail to cut the trade deficit. A weakening US dollar can have wide-ranging effects across global markets, businesses, and consumers. When the dollar loses value against other currencies, imported goods become more expensive for American consumers, increasing the cost of electronics, automobiles, and household products. Inflationary pressures may also rise as businesses pass on higher costs, eroding purchasing power.

On the other hand, a weaker dollar benefits US exporters by making American goods and services more affordable for foreign buyers. This can boost demand for US-made products, potentially leading to increased revenues for companies with international markets. Sectors like manufacturing, agriculture, and tourism often see gains as foreign customers find US goods and destinations more cost-effective.

“I could well imagine Trump getting frustrated and trying to implement wacky ideas, even if the logic isn’t there,” Barry Eichengreen, economics professor at UC Berkeley, told Reuters.

The administration’s apparent goal is to weaken the dollar to rebalance trade, potentially through a Mar-a-Lago Accord—a nod to the 1985 Plaza Accord and Trump’s Florida resort.

Stephen Miran, a Trump adviser, has suggested the U.S. could pressure foreign central banks to strengthen their currencies by leveraging tariffs and security commitments. But analysts say such a deal is unlikely, as higher interest rates would risk recession in Europe and Japan, and China needs a weaker yuan to revive growth.

If currency talks fail, Trump could take more extreme measures, such as restricting foreign access to dollar liquidity. Cutting off Federal Reserve swap lines—vital for global banks in times of crisis—could roil financial markets and hit European, Japanese, and British lenders hardest. Investors and financial markets also react to a weakening dollar in various ways.

US-based investors with holdings in foreign assets may see gains as those investments appreciate in dollar terms. Conversely, foreign investors holding US assets could experience lower returns if the dollar depreciates. The currency’s decline may also impact the bond market, as investors demand higher yields on US Treasury securities to compensate for currency risk.

Though the Fed controls these programs, Trump’s reshuffling of key financial regulators has raised concerns. “It’s no longer unthinkable that this could be used as a nuclear threat in negotiations,” said Spyros Andreopoulos of Thin Ice Macroeconomics.

But such a move could ultimately weaken the dollar’s status as the world’s dominant currency.

Commodity prices often respond significantly to dollar fluctuations. Since key commodities such as oil and gold are priced in US dollars, a weaker dollar generally pushes their prices higher. This can lead to increased costs for businesses that rely on raw materials, further fueling inflationary trends. On the flip side, commodity-producing countries may benefit from stronger revenues as the prices of their exports rise.

Another pressure point is the U.S. payments industry. Visa (V.N) and Mastercard (MA.N) process two-thirds of card transactions in the eurozone. While China and Japan have developed alternatives, Europe remains reliant on U.S. payment networks.

If the White House pressured these firms to cut off services—similar to actions taken against Russia—European consumers would be forced to rely on cash or slow bank transfers. “A hostile U.S. is a huge setback,” said Maria Demertzis of the Conference Board think tank. International trade dynamics can shift as countries reassess their economic strategies in response to currency fluctuations.

Ultimately, a weaker dollar carries both advantages and disadvantages depending on one’s perspective. While US manufacturers and exporters may enjoy competitive benefits, consumers and businesses reliant on imports could face higher costs. Investors must navigate currency risks carefully, and policymakers must balance economic growth with inflation control. The dollar’s movements influence economies worldwide, making its strength or weakness a critical factor in global financial stability.

Weakening Dollar

A weakening US dollar can have wide-ranging effects across global markets, businesses, and consumers. When the dollar loses value against other currencies, imported goods become more expensive for American consumers. Precisely because it takes more dollars to buy the same amount of foreign currency, raising the cost of imported electronics, automobiles, and everyday household products. Inflationary pressures may also increase as businesses pass higher costs on to consumers, reducing purchasing power.

On the other hand, a weaker dollar benefits US exporters by making American goods and services more affordable for foreign buyers. This can boost demand for US-made products, potentially leading to increased revenues for companies with international markets. Sectors like manufacturing, agriculture, and tourism often see gains as foreign customers find US goods and destinations more cost-effective.

Investors and financial markets also react to a weakening dollar in various ways. US-based investors with holdings in foreign assets may see gains as those investments appreciate in dollar terms. Conversely, foreign investors holding US assets could experience lower returns if the dollar depreciates. The currency’s decline may also impact the bond market, as investors demand higher yields on US Treasury securities to compensate for currency risk.

Commodity prices often respond significantly to dollar fluctuations. Since key commodities such as oil and gold are priced in US dollars, a weaker dollar generally pushes their prices higher. This can lead to increased costs for businesses that rely on raw materials, further fueling inflationary trends. On the flip side, commodity-producing countries may benefit from stronger revenues as the prices of their exports rise.

Government policies may force the Federal Reserve respond by adjusting interest rates to stabilize the currency and control inflation. Meanwhile, other central banks might intervene in currency markets to prevent excessive volatility. International trade dynamics can shift as countries reassess their economic strategies in response to currency fluctuations.

 

What US Copyright Office Says on AI-Generated Work and Copyrights Issue

The U.S. Copyright Office has released Part 2 of its Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, addressing the copyrightability of AI-generated works and reaffirming that human authorship remains essential for copyright protection in the United States. The report, a continuation of the Office’s AI initiative launched in early 2023, clarifies the level of human involvement required for AI-assisted works to qualify for copyright and examines how other countries approach similar issues.

The Office emphasizes that copyright law in the U.S. requires human authorship, citing the Copyright Clause in the Constitution and various legal precedents. Courts have consistently ruled that non-human entities cannot hold copyrights, a position the Office upholds. The Supreme Court has previously stated that an “author” is the person who translates an idea into a fixed, tangible expression entitled to copyright protection. Based on this principle, the Office asserts that AI-generated works alone cannot receive copyright protection, but works with sufficient human creativity may qualify.

 

The report outlines three scenarios in which AI-generated works may be eligible for copyright protection. First, AI tools used as an assistive mechanism, where the final creative expression is fundamentally human-authored, should not affect copyright eligibility. Second, when human-authored content is input into an AI system and remains perceptible in the output, copyright protection extends only to the human-created elements. Third, when AI-generated material is arranged or modified in a sufficiently creative way by a human, that specific human-authored contribution can be protected.

However, the Office firmly concludes that prompts alone do not constitute authorship, as AI systems produce unpredictable variations even when given identical inputs. The report notes that AI functions as a “black box,” with users and developers often unable to predict the exact outputs. As such, merely crafting a prompt is not enough to warrant copyright protection for the resulting AI-generated work.

The report also compares global approaches to AI-generated copyright. The European Union allows copyright protection only if significant human input is involved. The United Kingdom, under a pre-existing statute, grants copyright to computer-generated works where no human author exists, though this is currently under review. Japan evaluates copyright eligibility based on factors like user input, the number of generation attempts, and post-processing edits. China, in contrast, grants copyright to the individual using AI to create a work.

No new Acts Required

Despite calls for new protections for AI-generated materials, the Office does not see the need for legislative changes. It argues that existing U.S. copyright laws are flexible enough to accommodate AI advancements while ensuring human creativity remains protected. The report expresses concern that excessive legal protections for AI-generated works could diminish incentives for human authors, potentially stifling creative output.

Legal professionals are advised to consider the Office’s stance when assessing AI-related copyright matters. The key takeaways include the necessity of human authorship for copyright protection, the case-by-case evaluation of AI-assisted works, and the exclusion of AI prompts as a basis for copyright claims. Additionally, while AI-assisted creations may be protected under specific conditions, new legal frameworks are not currently needed.

The Copyright Office will continue to monitor technological and legal developments in AI and copyright law. The upcoming Part 3 of the report will address legal concerns related to training AI models on copyrighted works, licensing considerations, and the allocation of liability in AI-generated content.

ChatGPT’s Paid-subscribers surge to 2 crore, company valuation reaches $300 billion

OpenAI’s ChatGPT has seen a sharp rise in its paid subscriber base, climbing to over 20 million from 15.5 million in the past quarter, according to a report by The Information. The 30% increase in users has propelled an estimated monthly revenue boost from $333 million to $415 million.

The surge comes on the heels of OpenAI’s record-breaking $40 billion funding round, led by SoftBank, which pushed the company’s valuation to $300 billion. OpenAI also disclosed that more than 500 million people now use ChatGPT on a weekly basis.

The AI company is projecting substantial revenue growth, expecting to more than triple its earnings from $3.7 billion in 2024 to $12.7 billion in 2025. Bloomberg previously reported that OpenAI anticipates generating $29.4 billion in 2026.

Growing Demand and Operational Challenges

The rising number of paid subscribers highlights ChatGPT’s increasing popularity across various user bases. However, OpenAI continues to face high operational costs, including expenses related to AI chips, data centers, and talent acquisition.

Adding to its feature set, OpenAI on Tuesday introduced GPT-4o’s native image generation, allowing users to upload and edit images. The tool, which will soon be available across all ChatGPT tiers, has gained traction online. A recent viral trend saw users leveraging ChatGPT to create images in the style of Japan’s Studio Ghibli, further boosting engagement with the platform.

As demand for image generation soared, CEO Sam Altman implemented a rate limit, citing strain on OpenAI’s computing infrastructure. “Our GPUs are melting,” Altman remarked, referencing the surge in image-related prompts.

Subscription Plans and Features

ChatGPT currently offers two subscription tiers: Free and Pro. The Free tier provides access to GPT-3.5 with basic conversational features, while the Pro plan, priced at $20 per month, unlocks GPT-4 with enhanced capabilities such as improved reasoning, faster response times, and multimodal tools for text and image generation.

Pro users also benefit from higher usage limits, priority access during peak periods, and the ability to customize AI models to suit their needs.

Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 Introduced in LS, Sparks Heated Debate

The Lok Sabha witnessed intense discussions on the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024, as Law Minister Kiren Rijiju introduced the legislation. The bill aims to streamline the administration of Waqf properties, which are religious endowments under Islamic law.  

The debate quickly turned partisan, with the Congress party raising concerns about the potential impact of the bill on minority rights. They argued for a more thorough review and consultation process. The BJP, however, defended the bill, emphasizing its goal of bringing greater transparency and efficiency to the management of Waqf assets.  

Key points of contention included the proposed changes to the Waqf Tribunal’s powers and the mechanisms for resolving property disputes. Opposition members expressed worries about potential misuse of authority, while the government asserted the need for stronger oversight to prevent encroachments and mismanagement.

The Waqf Amendment Bill has generated significant debate, with varied perspectives on its potential impact. Here’s a breakdown of the pro and against points:

Arguments in Favor:

  • Improved Management and Transparency:
    • Proponents argue that the amendments aim to streamline the administration of Waqf properties, bringing greater transparency and efficiency to their management.
    • The emphasis on digitalization and centralized record-keeping is intended to reduce mismanagement and corruption.
  • Protection of Waqf Properties:
    • The government asserts that the bill seeks to protect Waqf properties from encroachment and illegal occupation, ensuring they are used for their intended charitable or religious purposes.
    • Strengthening the Waqf Tribunal’s powers is seen as necessary to resolve property disputes effectively.
  • Modernization and Efficiency:
    • The amendments are presented as a means to modernize the Waqf administration, making it more accountable and responsive to the needs of the community.
    • The inclusion of non-muslim members in the board, is argued by the government to bring expertise, and promote transparency.
  • Reducing Litigation:
    • The application of the limitation act, is argued to reduce prolonged litigation.

Arguments Against:

  • Concerns About Minority Rights:
    • Critics express concerns that the bill could infringe on the rights of minority communities to manage their religious endowments.
    • There are fears that the government could use the amendments to exert greater control over Waqf properties.
  • Potential for Misuse of Power:
    • Opposition members raise concerns about the potential for misuse of power by the Waqf Tribunal and other authorities.
    • They argue that the bill could lead to arbitrary decisions and unfair treatment of Waqf institutions.
  • Lack of Adequate Consultation:
    • Some critics argue that the government has not engaged in sufficient consultation with stakeholders, particularly minority communities.
    • They call for a more thorough review of the bill and greater transparency in the legislative process.
  • Constitutional Validity:
    • Some critics have questioned the constitutional validity of the bill, arguing that it may violate the principle of religious freedom.
  • Interference with Religious Affairs:
    • The inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf boards has been criticized as interference in the Muslim community’s right to manage its own affairs.

However, minister Kiren Rijiju stressed that the amendments are intended to protect Waqf properties and ensure their proper utilization for the benefit of the community. He reiterated the government’s commitment to safeguarding the interests of all stakeholders.

The Lok Sabha is expected to continue discussions on the bill in the coming days, with further amendments and clarifications likely.