How US Tariffs Played Havoc in Markets? Timeline of Key Tariff Moments

Over the past year, U.S. trade policy has swung sharply back toward broad-based tariffs, reviving uncertainty across global markets and supply chains.

The shift began on Feb. 1, 2025, when the administration imposed new tariffs on Chinese imports, citing fentanyl-linked supply chains, unfair trade practices and trade imbalances. Days later, Washington announced plans for 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada on national security grounds, though these were later paused and modified, with exemptions for USMCA-compliant goods.

The most dramatic move came on April 2, 2025, when the White House unveiled sweeping “Liberation Day” reciprocal tariffs on most U.S. imports. Invoking emergency powers, the administration imposed a baseline tariff of about 10%, with higher rates for selected countries. Subsequent executive orders in April and May adjusted rates and expanded coverage, including changes to duties on low-value Chinese imports.

Legal pressure mounted on May 28, when the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that parts of the emergency tariffs exceeded presidential authority, throwing their durability into question. Despite this, tariff actions continued, including higher duties on copper imports in June and threats of tariffs of up to 50% on Brazilian goods in July.

By mid-2025, new tariffs were announced on Indonesian and Indian imports, while several high duties came into force in August amid diplomatic talks and WTO challenges. Further rate adjustments followed in November.

By late 2025, U.S. average tariff rates had climbed to multi-decade highs, boosting customs revenue but weighing on business confidence.

On Feb. 20, 2026, the Supreme Court struck down most emergency tariffs imposed under the IEEPA. Hours later, the president imposed a temporary 10% global tariff under separate legal authority, keeping trade tensions firmly in place.

Timeline of Market Movements

Feb. 1, 2025 – New US tariffs against China revive trade-war risk; Asian equities and exporters come under pressure.

Feb.–Mar. 2025 – Trump Threatens tariffs on Mexico and Canada unsettle North American supply chains before exemptions ease market stress.

April 2, 2025 – “Liberation Day” tariffs trigger global equity sell-offs, currency volatility and higher import-cost forecasts.

April–May 2025 – Repeated rate adjustments fuel uncertainty, complicating pricing decisions for manufacturers and retailers.

May 28, 2025 – Trade court ruling introduces refund risk for importers, lifting bond-market focus on fiscal exposure.

June 30, 2025 – Copper tariffs push metals prices higher and raise costs for construction and manufacturing firms.

July 2025 – Tariff threats against Brazil, followed by moves on Indonesia and India, widen emerging-market trade risk premiums.

August 2025 – Implementation of high tariffs lifts U.S. customs revenue but deepens concerns over inflation pass-through.

Nov. 2025 – Further tariff tweaks add to year-end volatility in equities and currencies.

Feb. 20, 2026 – US Supreme Court ruling briefly boosts markets on hopes of tariff rollback.

Feb. 20, 2026 – A new temporary 10% global tariff reins in optimism, restoring uncertainty over trade, inflation and growth.

After tariffs, what’s Trump’s next Move? Watch out US dollar weakening

As the dust begins to settle down on President Donald Trump’s latest tariffs, speculation is growing over his next move. With the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, Trump has powerful tools to pressure allies—credit access, dollar funding, and payment systems, which may be wielded as powerful weapons to subject compliance from foes and allies together.

Deploying these weapons would carry major risks for the U.S. economy and could backfire, but some experts warn they remain on the table if tariffs fail to cut the trade deficit. A weakening US dollar can have wide-ranging effects across global markets, businesses, and consumers. When the dollar loses value against other currencies, imported goods become more expensive for American consumers, increasing the cost of electronics, automobiles, and household products. Inflationary pressures may also rise as businesses pass on higher costs, eroding purchasing power.

On the other hand, a weaker dollar benefits US exporters by making American goods and services more affordable for foreign buyers. This can boost demand for US-made products, potentially leading to increased revenues for companies with international markets. Sectors like manufacturing, agriculture, and tourism often see gains as foreign customers find US goods and destinations more cost-effective.

“I could well imagine Trump getting frustrated and trying to implement wacky ideas, even if the logic isn’t there,” Barry Eichengreen, economics professor at UC Berkeley, told Reuters.

The administration’s apparent goal is to weaken the dollar to rebalance trade, potentially through a Mar-a-Lago Accord—a nod to the 1985 Plaza Accord and Trump’s Florida resort.

Stephen Miran, a Trump adviser, has suggested the U.S. could pressure foreign central banks to strengthen their currencies by leveraging tariffs and security commitments. But analysts say such a deal is unlikely, as higher interest rates would risk recession in Europe and Japan, and China needs a weaker yuan to revive growth.

If currency talks fail, Trump could take more extreme measures, such as restricting foreign access to dollar liquidity. Cutting off Federal Reserve swap lines—vital for global banks in times of crisis—could roil financial markets and hit European, Japanese, and British lenders hardest. Investors and financial markets also react to a weakening dollar in various ways.

US-based investors with holdings in foreign assets may see gains as those investments appreciate in dollar terms. Conversely, foreign investors holding US assets could experience lower returns if the dollar depreciates. The currency’s decline may also impact the bond market, as investors demand higher yields on US Treasury securities to compensate for currency risk.

Though the Fed controls these programs, Trump’s reshuffling of key financial regulators has raised concerns. “It’s no longer unthinkable that this could be used as a nuclear threat in negotiations,” said Spyros Andreopoulos of Thin Ice Macroeconomics.

But such a move could ultimately weaken the dollar’s status as the world’s dominant currency.

Commodity prices often respond significantly to dollar fluctuations. Since key commodities such as oil and gold are priced in US dollars, a weaker dollar generally pushes their prices higher. This can lead to increased costs for businesses that rely on raw materials, further fueling inflationary trends. On the flip side, commodity-producing countries may benefit from stronger revenues as the prices of their exports rise.

Another pressure point is the U.S. payments industry. Visa (V.N) and Mastercard (MA.N) process two-thirds of card transactions in the eurozone. While China and Japan have developed alternatives, Europe remains reliant on U.S. payment networks.

If the White House pressured these firms to cut off services—similar to actions taken against Russia—European consumers would be forced to rely on cash or slow bank transfers. “A hostile U.S. is a huge setback,” said Maria Demertzis of the Conference Board think tank. International trade dynamics can shift as countries reassess their economic strategies in response to currency fluctuations.

Ultimately, a weaker dollar carries both advantages and disadvantages depending on one’s perspective. While US manufacturers and exporters may enjoy competitive benefits, consumers and businesses reliant on imports could face higher costs. Investors must navigate currency risks carefully, and policymakers must balance economic growth with inflation control. The dollar’s movements influence economies worldwide, making its strength or weakness a critical factor in global financial stability.

Weakening Dollar

A weakening US dollar can have wide-ranging effects across global markets, businesses, and consumers. When the dollar loses value against other currencies, imported goods become more expensive for American consumers. Precisely because it takes more dollars to buy the same amount of foreign currency, raising the cost of imported electronics, automobiles, and everyday household products. Inflationary pressures may also increase as businesses pass higher costs on to consumers, reducing purchasing power.

On the other hand, a weaker dollar benefits US exporters by making American goods and services more affordable for foreign buyers. This can boost demand for US-made products, potentially leading to increased revenues for companies with international markets. Sectors like manufacturing, agriculture, and tourism often see gains as foreign customers find US goods and destinations more cost-effective.

Investors and financial markets also react to a weakening dollar in various ways. US-based investors with holdings in foreign assets may see gains as those investments appreciate in dollar terms. Conversely, foreign investors holding US assets could experience lower returns if the dollar depreciates. The currency’s decline may also impact the bond market, as investors demand higher yields on US Treasury securities to compensate for currency risk.

Commodity prices often respond significantly to dollar fluctuations. Since key commodities such as oil and gold are priced in US dollars, a weaker dollar generally pushes their prices higher. This can lead to increased costs for businesses that rely on raw materials, further fueling inflationary trends. On the flip side, commodity-producing countries may benefit from stronger revenues as the prices of their exports rise.

Government policies may force the Federal Reserve respond by adjusting interest rates to stabilize the currency and control inflation. Meanwhile, other central banks might intervene in currency markets to prevent excessive volatility. International trade dynamics can shift as countries reassess their economic strategies in response to currency fluctuations.