How moss led to the solving a grave-robbing mystery

Posted on March 14, 2026 by Sridhar P

In 2009, a cemetery, located directly outside of Chicago, revealed a scandal. The employees at the Burr Oak Cemetery in Alsip, Illinois had been accused of digging up aged graves, shifting the remains to other places within the cemetery and selling the burial plots back. One such piece of evidence was a small knot of moss when the case went to trial in 2015.

Researchers have published the original full scientific account of the case in a new article in the journal Forensic Sciences Research where it is described how exactly moss was used to find that a crime had been committed.

The lead author of the paper, Matt von Konrat, the head of the botany collections at the Field Museum in Chicago, is a follower of detective programs on television (the new paper is called Silent Witness on the BBC), but he never thought that his work would bring him into a criminal case scenario. Around 2009, von Konrat received a call on the phone, which happened to be the FBI, inquiring whether she could assist in identifying a few plants, says von Konrat. The FBI appeared at the Field Museum and gave von Konrat a piece of moss which was discovered eight inches under the earth, and the recovered human remains at the cemetery.

What sort of moss it was, and how long it had been lying in the soil, they wanted to know.

First, von Konrat and his associates had looked at the moss under a microscope and compared it with dried moss specimens in museum collections to conclude that it was taxifolius Fissidens, which is also referred to as a common pocket moss. According to von Konrat, they conducted a survey of the various types of mosses found in different locations around the site of the crime and that type of moss was not present in the area. However, examining the remainder of the cemetery we discovered a large colony of that form of moss growing in the same spot where the investigator thought that the bones had been disturbed.

The investigators did not only require the species of the moss, however, they were also concerned about its age. The defendants to the case argued that someone must have exhumed the bones and reburied them at a later time prior to the defendants commencing working in the cemetery. As the moss was buried with the re-buried bones, the length of time that the moss had been under the ground would be used to help prove the date that the bones were reburied.

“Moss,” says von Konrat, “is a bit of a freak. Mosses are intriguingly physiologically regulated so that although they may be dry and lifeless and preserved, still they may have an active metabolism and some active cells. The level of metabolic activity decays with time, and that would inform us about when a moss sample was harvested.”

The metabolic activity of a plant may be determined by its chlorophyll – the green color that is used to photosynthesize the food. The chlorophyll in the cells of plants deteriorates as they die and more of the cells of plants lose the ability to perform their functions. The authors of the research determined the quantity of the light captured by chlorophyll of the moss specimens in known ages, including fresh and those that have been stashed in the museum collections over the past 14 years. Then they repeated the same test on the moss that was picked at the crime scene. The researchers concluded that the evidence moss was no more than a year or two old- which helped the case against the cemetery employees who in 2015 were finally found guilty of desecrating human remains.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burr_Oak_Cemetery

“Occasionally, there are also cases when the FBI only has to summon experts to assist in the gathering of evidence, conduct analyses, submit the evidence to the prosecutors and testify to their efforts should a conviction be required. Burr Oak Cemetery case was one of those cases when we approached the Chicago Field Museum Botanical Program, which happened to be of invaluable help since plant material within the cemetery provided the key to charge four individuals and convict them,” says Doug Seccombe, a former FBI agent and worked on the case, as well as, a co-author of the new paper.

Von Konrat has been consulted after the Burr Oak Cemetery case on a number of moss cases. However, these cases are quite few in the field of forensic science: in 2025, he and some of his co-authors released another article, looking into the application of mosses and other bryophyte plants as forensic evidence. It was only within the last century that they had discovered a dozen-odd examples.

“Mosses are usually underrated and that is how we hope our research will help to create awareness that there are other groups of plants out there other than flowering plants and they play a very crucial role in society and around us. However, most to the point, we wish to mention this microscopic group of plants as a law enforcement tool. Should we find the means of raising mosses as possible evidence, perhaps this might prove of service to some families in the future.”

One-third of Gen Z men agree a wife should obey husband, compared to Baby Boomers

Posted on March 14, 2026 by Sridhar P

A new international survey of 23,000 individuals shows that 31 percent of Gen Z men concur that a wife must always be submissive to her husband and that one third (33 percent) believes that a husband must have the final say when it comes to making significant decisions.

Gen Z men (born 1997-2012) were twice as apt to hold traditional perspectives in decision-making in a marriage, with only 13% and 17% of Baby Boomers men concurring with those words respectively.

In comparison, much fewer female Gen Zers (18% and even fewer Baby Boomer women) said that a wife should be submissive to her husband all the time.

Although the survey conducted by 29 countries, including Great Britain, USA, Brazil, Australia and India, conducted on young men, they are more likely than older generations to have conservative views regarding gender roles.

The survey commissioned by Ipsos in the UK and the Global Institute of Women Leadership at King Business School, King College London, to celebrate the International Women Day 2026 shows that there are sharp disparities among various generations of men concerning the issue of gender roles:

24% don’t see woman to be independent, self-reliant

Nearly a quarter (24% of Gen Z men concur that a woman is not supposed to look too independent and self-reliant, compared to 12% of Baby Boomer men. The consensus among women was also significantly lower at 15% with Gen Z and 9% with Baby Boomers.

Generational differences in attitudes towards sexual norms are also very sharp: 21% of men of Gen Z believe that a real woman must never take the initiative to initiate sex, whereas only 7% of Baby Boomer men do. Only 12% of Gen Z women concurred but the women and men of the Baby Boomer generation were at par, 7% to this query.

Gen Z men report that they expect men to do too much to achieve equality (59%), as opposed to Baby Boomer men (45%), again, this was higher than the proportion of women who agreed with the same (41% and 30% respectively).

Although Gen Z men were the most likely to think that a woman should not seem too independent or self-reliant, this same group was also the one who most likely to think that women with successful career are more appealing to men, with 41% believing this statement versus 27% of the Baby Boomers of both sexes.

Older generations more liberal

The findings indicate that the older generations of men and the female Gen Z group have more liberal expectations of their own behaviour and choices as well compared to the Gen Z male. For example:

Gen Z men who answered the survey are more likely to think men should not say to their friends I love you 30% as opposed to 20% of Baby Boomer men and 21% of Gen Z women.
Gen Z men (43 percent) also consider it true that young men are supposed to attempt to be physically tough, even when they are not by nature big, than all respondents (32 percent) and Gen Z women (28 percent).
Gen Z men who are less confident that men who engage in caring for children are less masculine than those who do not (21 percent) are half as many as Baby Boomer men (8 percent) and even less than Gen Z women (14 per cent).

Not just generational differences, the averages of 29 countries indicate that there is also a gap between what the individuals themselves believe concerning gender roles in the house, and what society believes they should believe.

There were more uniform ideas among people, with only one out of six saying that women ought to do the majority of childcare (17%) or household work (other than childcare) (16%), and less than a quarter (24%) that men should do the majority of the work in earning.

Nevertheless, several of the respondents thought that perceptions of traditional gender roles are still common in their country:

More than one-third (35) of them reported that they think more in their country believe women are supposed to assume the primary responsibility of caring and other household chores.
Four out of 10 (40 percent) respondents responded that they believe most of the population in their country believes that men are supposed to be the breadwinners.
Only 31% of people around the world believe that people in their country believe that men should make the last word on important decisions in the household, and only 21 percent of themselves agree with that statement.

Although the respondents in Great Britain were less than average to have traditional views about the household duties, they still believed that the society had a traditional expectation.

As an illustration, personal attitudes varied in Great Britain with only 14% thinking women needed to take on the greatest responsibility with childcare but 43% thinking women were expected to do so, 15% said they personally thought men had a responsibility to make money and 38% said they thought society expected men to have a responsibility.

Great re-negotiation era on gender norms

In the UK, Ireland and Chief Executive of Ipsos, Kelly Beaver, said: “The survey conducted this year demonstrates that we are possibly entering into a great re-negotiation of how men and women occupy gender roles in the current society. Gen Z, especially, are the most contradictory in our data: they are the group most likely to agree that a successful career in women makes them more attractive with men and are also the group most likely to agree that a wife should never be disobedient to her husband and that women should never seem too self-sufficient or independent.”

This duality in views provides the critical dialogue of redefining the gender norms and the relationships between modernity and tradition are so intricate, and we need to explore more about cultural, social, and economic forces that shape these beliefs. “We should aim at enjoying inclusive discussions that will promote tolerance and acceptance of various gender roles and create a more equal and balanced society and a freer and more equal future to everyone.”

Director of the Global Institute of Women Leadership, King business school, Professor Heejung Chung stated: “It is alarming to observe that traditional gender norms are still present in the modern world, and it is even more unsettling that most people feel like they are under pressure due to the social expectations that are not necessarily what a majority of us believe.”

Julia Gillard, the Chair of the Global Institute of Women Leadership, King Business School, added: “It is disappointing to find out that the attitude to gender equality is not more favourable, especially among young men. Not only do many Gen Z men impose restrictive demands on women, but they are also confining themselves in restrictive gender standards.”

“There is more work that we need to do to bust the notion of the so-called zero-sum game where women are the exclusive beneficiaries of the world being gender-equal. We must make everyone board the gender equality train, where people should clearly see the reasons why it is useful to the entire society.” This report offers the much-needed information on the global trends in regard to gender equality.

“As a society we need to resist the pressure to go backwards and accelerate the pace of change. Good research is critical to reasoned debate and forward progress, ” she says.

Emotional AI and gen Z: The attitude towards new technology and its concerns

‘By women, for women’: 15 years of the UN agency championing gender equality

A folding sheet robot that can deliver drugs with precision is here

Posted on March 14, 2026 by Sridhar P

A new magnetorheological fluid-based soft robot created by the researchers includes reversible t robot with reversible gastrointestinal tract medical applications.

Millions of people around the world are infected with gastrointestinal tract diseases and the conventional drug delivery system lacks high targeting capacity with chances of side effects of systemic drug delivery. The development of magnetic soft robots has become an innovative solution to minimally invasive medical procedures, due to their miniaturity, untethered locomotion and their agile movements. Nonetheless, the current magnetic soft robots have severe constraints of multi-angle folding, real time reconfigurable magnetization, and compliance with the irregular and constrained gastrointestinal cavity, which are the barriers to clinical use of targeted drug delivery.

In order to solve these problems, a research team, comprising of researchers at China University of Mining and Technology, Soochow University, RWTH Aachen University and the University of Oxford created a magnetic soft sheet robot with magnetorheological fluids. The robot takes the form of a four-layered fully-soft sheet, which consists of upper and bottom layers of linear low-density polyethylene surface, a core layer of magnetorheological fluids and a polyamide nylon mesh support layer. The robot is non-magnetized in zero magnetic field, weighing 0.55 g (a weight of 30 mm in length, 10 mm in width, 1.5 mm in thickness), which is small (30 mm in length, 10 mm in width, 1.5 mm in thickness), which removes unwanted magnetic interference in the human body.

The main novelty of such robot is the magnetization, which can be reconfigured in real time, and the performance by reversible folding. The magnetic particle chains along the magnetic field direction can be generated by the internal magnetorheological fluids within milliseconds under the external magnetic and the magnetization direction can be dynamically readjusted using the spatial magnetic field. Propelled by a 5 degree of freedom magnetic field platform, the robot can be folded to a one third size of the original to move in slender intestinal tracts and unfolded to a large surface area to move in a stable fashion within the stomach cavity-achieving the flexible adaptation to the different spatial sizes of the gastrointestinal tract.

The research group used the fabrication of five prototypes of the soft sheet robot with varying magnetorheological fluid densities (3.0 g/mL to 4.2 g/mL) and a series of motion performance tests under various environments.
The robot was found to have a stable flip, steering and folding motion on smooth surfaces, on flexible fluff surfaces and on slope surfaces and also in environment with underwater. It was also able to maintain consistent performance of movement even under load (carrying biodegradable hydrogel drugs with a mass of 0.15 g, which is about 30 percent of the own mass of the robot).
The ex vivo porcine stomach experiments, which mimicked the human gastrointestinal environment, were done to have critical validation. The robot was able to reach any predetermined location in the porcine stomach in an average of 5 minutes and firmly secured to the point of drug release with the loaded hydrogel drugs dissolving within 30 minutes to create localized targeted therapy in 10 repetitions.
Also, the ultrasonic detection technology (Voluson E10), was able to trace real-time movements of the robot in closed gastric cavity, which proved traceable and controllable in closed biological environments- a technical assurance in monitoring robots in clinical practices.

The biocompatibility tests continued to confirm the safety of the robot when used in human body: the robot was immersed in the simulated gastric juice (pH 1.2) and intestinal juice (pH 6.8) at 37degC after 24 hours and no rupture of its surfaces, expansion of its volume and deformation of the shape were observed. It was revealed that no exceeding of the safety levels was detected in the extract solutions by the heavy metals and harmful substances and no bacterial colonies were obtained in the tests related to the growth of microbial cultures, which indicates the biocompatibility and non-toxicity of the robot in the gastrointestinal tract environment.

The research team observed that the magnetic soft sheet robot has overcome the technical bottlenecks of the conventional magnetic soft robots in terms of folding capability and magnetization ability. It has the benefit of untethered drive, complete soft-structure, and excellent targeting precision, which render it the best noninvasive medical device to deliver drugs to the gastrointestinal tract.

Exposure to air pollution in infancy alters gut microorganisms, may boost disease risk [Preventive Steps]

Less psychedelic, more medical magic mushrooms

Could a hot cup of matcha dial down the ‘sneeze switch’ in allergic rhinitis?

Posted on March 13, 2026 by Sridhar P

This is another reason I love Japanese popular matcha: a mouse study states that the green tea powder might decrease the necessity to sneeze in persons with nasal allergies.

Matcha is a clear green powder created by the dried and grounded leaves of green tea, which have been particularly grown. It is consumed as a tea beverage, and also as a flavouring ingredient in a large variety of commodities. It has been demonstrated that tea has been found to have high concentrations of biologically active compounds, which include antioxidants and amino acids, and its use is associated with numerous health benefits, including better heart and brain functioning, and decreased inflammation.

Hiroshima University in Japan was especially interested in matcha effects on people with allergic rhinitis (also called hay fever) especially by Professor Osamu Kaminuma, of the Research Institute of Radiation Biology and Medicine. There is no clear understanding of the mechanism of action of green tea on allergic rhinitis despite human studies being in the process of pointing out that it can help relieve allergic rhinitis.

Kaminuma and colleagues published an early access article in NPJ Science of Food on March 5 stating that mice with symptoms of hay fever were fed matcha tea in 2-3 doses weekly over a period of greater than five weeks and a second dose of tea 30 minutes prior to allergen exposure to instigate symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

Matcha treatment reduced allergy in mice

The group discovered that the sneezing of the mice was significantly reduced than anticipated with matcha treatment but what was found to be more interesting was that the matcha did not seem to influence the allergenic reactions of immunoglobulin E (IgE), mast cells, and T cells.

The role of IgE antibodies attaching to mast cells is central to the process of an allergic reaction and the subsequent release of histamine and other inflammatory chemicals. The initial part of the allergic response is mediated by mast cells, whereas the T cells mediate more prolonged immune responses, such as the production of IgE.

Oral matcha suppressed sneezing without a definite alteration of key immune parameters. It instead had a strong suppressive effect on brainstem neuronal activation associated to sneezing reflex, Kaminuma explained.

The activity of a gene, c-Fos-indicator of neurological and behavioural reactions to a strong stimulus such as exposure to an allergen causing hay fever was studied in the ventral spinal trigeminal nucleus caudali or the part of the brain associated with sneezing. They discovered that, the mice were in a state of hay fever; the c-Fos gene expression was high but this was reduced nearly to normal by medication with matcha.

The second thing to do is to research as to whether these effects are present in humans as well. Kaminuma said: The aim is an evidence-based, food-based alternative that includes typical care of the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

What’s ‘Manohari’ tea? Just sold at Rs.1.15 lakh per kg in auction

Daily 4 cups of black or green or Oolong tea can cut diabetes risk by 17%

Report calls for AI toy safety standards to protect young children

Posted on March 13, 2026 by Sridhar P

According to a report that cautions against the use of AI-powered talking toys on small children, the toys should be more strictly regulated and have new safety kitemarks, since they are not necessarily intended at children with the safety of their psychology in mind.

The suggestion is found in the first report of AI in the Early Years: a University of Cambridge project and the first systematic study of how Generative AI (GenAI) toys that can have human-like conversation can affect development during critical years of up to age five.

This was a one-year project at the Faculty of Education at the university where formal scientific observations of children at the initial encounter with a GenAI toy were carried out.

The report reflects the perceptions of a few of the early-years practitioners that, over time, these toys would be useful in areas of child development, including language and communication skills. The researchers also discovered, however, that GenAI toys are not good at social and pretend play, do not understand children, and respond in the wrong way to emotions.

As an illustration, if a five-year-old child said to the toy, I love you, it responded, As a friendly reminder, please, make interactions in accordance with the guidelines given. Please tell me what you wish me to do.

Even though genAI toys are highly sold as learning companions or friends, their effect on the development of early years has hardly been examined. The report encourages parents and teachers to be careful. It suggests a more direct regulation, open privacy policy and new labeling norms to allow families to make their own decision about the suitability of toys.

NGOs help conduct studies

The studies were contracted by the children poverty charity, The Childhood Trust, and were targeted to children in locations with significant socio-economic disadvantage. Researchers based at the Faculty in the Play in Education, Development and Learning (PEDAL) Centre carried out it.

Researcher Dr Emily Goodacre, opined: Generative AI toys tend to confirm they are friends with a child who is only beginning to understand the meaning of friendship. They can begin conversing with the toy regarding emotions and requirements, instead of discussing them with an adult. Since these toys might fail to interpret emotions correctly or act in a wrong way, children might be deprived of the comfort provided by the toy – and without the emotional assistance by an adult, either.

The research was maintained in a small scale deliberately to be able to observe the play of children in greater detail and to observe the finer details that would be overlooked in a bigger scale study.

The researchers question early years educators survey to investigate their concerns and attitudes and conducted more detailed focus groups and workshops with early years practitioners and 19 leaders of children charities. They also video-recorded 14 children playing with GenAI soft toy, named Gabbo, in London children centres working with someone called Babyzone, an early years charity. They also interviewed every child and a parent after the play sessions using a drawing activity to facilitate the dialogue.

The majority of parents and educators believed that AI toys may assist in the growth of the communication abilities of children and some parents were eager to learn about their educational possibilities. One of them informed the researchers: “I want to buy it in case it is sold.

There was concern among many about children developing the so-called para-social relationships with toys. The observations proved this: the children hugged and kissed the toy, said that they loved it and – in the case of one of the children – proposed to play hide-and-seek together.

Kid believe toys love them back

Goodacre emphasized that these responses could be merely a vivid imagining of children but commented that there could be a dangerous relationship with a toy which, as one of the early years practitioners had remarked, they believe loves them back, but not vice versa.

The children were also having difficulties with the conversation of the toy. It even disregarded their interruptions, confused the voices of parents with the voice of the child and did not even give the appropriate answers to seemingly significant statements about feelings. A number of children were seen to get frustrated when no one appeared to be listening.

When one of the three year old children said to the toy: I am sad, the toy mishheard, and answered: Don’t worry! I’m a happy little bot. Let’s keep the fun going. What shall we talk about next?” According to researchers, this could have indicated that the sadness of the child was not significant.

The authors discovered that GenAI toys are also not good at social play, playing with many children and/or adults, and pretend play – both of which are important in the early childhood development. In such a way, when a three-year-old child tried to give the toy an imaginary present, the latter reacted by saying: I cannot open the present – and shifted to another topic.

Most parents were concerned about the data that the toy could be capturing and where this could be stored. In choosing a GenAI toy to be used as a research, the researchers discovered that privacy practices of many GenAI toys are not very transparent or that they do not provide crucial information about them.

AI toys increase digital divide

Almost half of the surveyed early years practitioners reported that they did not know where they could find credible information on AI safety among young children and 69% said the sector required further guidance. They also highlighted the issue of protection and affordability with others being worried that AI toys would increase the digital divide.

The authors claim that most of these issues would be resolved by working out clearer regulation. They suggest restricting the distance at which toys can make children befriend or confide in them, more open privacy policies and more restrictive access of third parties to AI models.

One of the recurring themes of the focus groups, the other co-author of the study Professor Jenny Gibson added, was that individuals did not trust tech companies to do the right thing. Clear, forceful, disciplined standards would go a long way in enhancing consumer confidence.

The report recommends that manufacturers should test toys on children and consult experts in safeguarding before launching new toys as well as urging parents to research GenAI toys before purchase.

Middle East and Global Energy Markets; Why is Strait of Hormuz so important?

Posted on March 13, 2026 by Sridhar P

The IEA is reacting to the effects of the conflict in the Middle East on the energy market. The Strait of Hormuz holds significant effects on the world economy and the energy security and affordability through the disruption of oil and gas flows through the Strait of Hormuz, and energy infrastructure in the region.

The conflict in the area which started on 28 February has disrupted the streams of energy trade across the Strait causing the biggest supply shock in the history of the global oil market. The situation has also decreased the supply of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the world by approximately 20%.

On 11 March, the IEA Member countries had unanimously agreed to conduct the largest ever emergency release of their oil stocks as a measure to contain the market shocks.

Current market backdrop

The prices of oil and natural gas have upsurged owing to the war. By 11 March, Brent crude futures have increased more than 25 per cent since the hostilities began on 28 February, and Dutch TTF, the European natural gas market, has increased by nearly 60 per cent. Oil products markets have also been especially hit such as the diesel and the jet fuel markets. The effects are being experienced worldwide.

Flows of crude and oil products via the Strait of Hormuz have fallen to a mere trickle of approximately 20 million barrels per day (mb/d) prior to the war and currently. Traffic paralyzed, little ability to circumvent the waterway of the crucible, and storage is filling, the Gulf Countries have reduced the overall production of oil by no less than 10 mb/d, as we have reported in our latest Oil Market Report, released on 12 March. Unless shipping traffic is quickly restored, loss of supply will continue to expand.

The gulf region is one of the major exporters of the refined oil products to world markets, especially to the middle distillates, used as diesel and jet fuel. In 2025, the gulf producers sold 3.3 mb/d of refined oil products and 1.5 mb/d of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Already more than 3 mb/d of refining capacity in the region has been shut down as a result of attacks and non-existent viable outlets to export.

The middle distillates markets globally have not been very tight in comparison with other products. Consequently, the refineries outside the area seem to have limited scope to pump more diesel and jet fuel to offset such losses in case of losses in supply on a lasting basis.

Global Markets(Wikipedia)

The oil consuming nations have large reserves of oil to overcome short time losses in supply. The international recorded stocks of crude and products are at present estimated to dominate above 8.2 billion barrels, the maximum amount since February 2021. Approximately 50 of these are in the advanced economies with 1.25 billion barrels of these in government emergency stock with an additional 600million barrels of industry stocks obligated by the government. These stocks are the foundation of the emergency collective action which IEA has declared on 11 March to provide more oil supply into the market.

The war has also greatly affected the LNG production in the Gulf region. The global natural gas markets were slowly rebalancing after a massive shock occurred after the invasion of Russia in Ukraine in February 2022. It is projected that a new wave of LNG capacity will be introduced between now and the end of this decade and this will change the dynamics of the markets. But the tightness in gas markets in the first two months of 2026, and empty storage at the end of the heating season in the Northern Hemisphere is poised to drive up the demand on LNG in much of the next few months.

A prolonged outage of production in the Ras Laffan plant in Qatar may further create a serious issue in this market tightness. On 2 March, an attack on the facilities brought about production shutdown. Ras Laffan delivered 112 billion cubic metres (bcm) of LNG, also 300 000 barrels per day of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and 180 000 barrels per day of condensate, making it by far the largest LNG plant in the world.

What is so special about the Strait of Hormuz?

Strait of Hormuz is a slender sea passage, which is located between the Arabian Peninsula and Iran, and, which links the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is an important trade route and is the main outlet of oil and natural gas that are manufactured in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, Bahrain and Iran.

It was estimated that in 2025 around 25% of the world seaborne oil trade passed through the Strait, and there are few alternatives to oil flows avoiding the Strait of Hormuz. Crude pipelines only exist in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which would potentially allow the rerouting to avoid the Strait with a capacity of 3.5 mb/d to 5.5 mb/d. Countries such as Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain are also dependent on the Strait to export the large percentage of their oil products.

In 2025, approximately 80 percent of the oil and oil products passing through the Strait was bound to Asia.

Besides that, more than 110 bcm of LNG went through the Strait of Hormuz in 2025. Approximately 93 percent of Qatar and 96 percent of the UAE LNG exports went across the Strait, which constitutes nearly a fifth of the entire LNG trade in the world. It does not have any other option of distributing these volumes to the market.

The majority of the LNG in the UAE and Qatar is shipped to Asia. In 2025, approximately 90 percent of the total amounts that get exported through the Strait of Hormuz was allocated to the Asian market. Just over 10% went to Europe.

DRDO, Indian Navy conduct trials of Air Droppable Container from P8I aircraft

Posted on March 11, 2026 by Sridhar P

Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) and the Indian Navy jointly conducted four successful in-flight release trials of the indigenous Air Droppable Container ‘ADC-150’ from the P8I aircraft off the coast of Goa between February 21 to March 01, 2026, at different extreme release conditions. Indigenously designed and developed to deliver 150 kg payload, the Air Droppable Container enhances the naval operational logistics capabilities for providing quick response to naval vessels under distress, needing critical stores/equipment, medical assistance etc. at blue sea deployed far from the coast.

The Naval Science & Technological Laboratory, Visakhapatnam is the nodal laboratory for the activity. Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment, Agra has developed the parachute system and Centre for Military Airworthiness & Certification, Bengaluru provided the flight clearance & certification. Defence Research & Development Laboratory, Hyderabad provided the instrumentation support for the trials.

To meet the requirement of the Indian Navy, the ADC-150 system for the P8I aircraft was developed and qualified in a short timeframe. As all the developmental flight trials have been completed successfully, the system is expected to be inducted into the Indian Navy soon.

What makes a hit? On Tiktok and Spotify, listeners only partly decide

Posted on March 11, 2026 by Sridhar P

TikTok is built for people to create and share their own content, so dance music and indie artists fill the platform’s Top 100. On Spotify, love songs and music from major record labels dominate its top charts. On both platforms, people’s preferences only partly explain what songs become hits.

A new University of California, Davis, study examined how the data-driven business models of TikTok and Spotify shape both the music artists make, and the songs people listen to. The study was published Feb. 27 in the journal Information, Communication & Society, and co-authored by researchers from Renmin University of China, Chinese University of Hong Kong and Tsinghua University.

“Hit song charts represent both user feedback and selections curated by the platforms’ algorithms that also influence users’ choices,” said Cuihua (Cindy) Shen, a UC Davis professor of communication and the study’s corresponding author. “By publishing hit song charts, platforms are declaring what songs are visible and dominant.”

How hits happen

TikTok is a global leader in user-generated short videos, frequently featuring remixes and clips of popular songs. Spotify is a major player in distributing full-length albums. With TikTok’s roughly 1.6 billion monthly active users and Spotify’s 675 million, both platforms serve massive and truly global audiences.

In analyzing differences between the platforms and 2020-22 data from their respective Top 100 hit song charts, researchers found significant differences in what makes a hit.

On TikTok, popularity was driven more by dance genres that suit the platform’s emphasis on user engagement and its popular “dance challenges,” which promotes user videos featuring specific songs and dance moves.

On Spotify, songs about relationships were popular, while songs about politics were unpopular. Spotify had more hit songs produced by major labels and songs in the pop and hip-hop/rap/trap genres. It had a lower proportion of songs from R&B/soul and dance genres.

In the study, TikTok’s Top 100 charts — during the two years analyzed — had 321 songs compared to 1,707 on Spotify. Only 68 hit songs appeared on both platforms within the two-year study period, and a majority entered and exited Spotify’s daily Top 100 charts more quickly than on TikTok.

Different platforms, different hits

TikTok and Spotify differ from traditional media such as radio and even MTV. On both apps, user data, such as clicks and subscriptions, are fed into the platforms’ algorithms and influence the music that artists create to meet demand.

This study highlights how the differences between the two platforms affect what makes a Top 100 hit. Spotify focuses on streaming full-length music and provides detailed metadata, including lyrics. TikTok features clipped snippets of songs that serve as background to users’ video content.

“Our study suggests that Spotify acts as a primary distribution channel while TikTok serves as a space for creative re-interpretation,” said Shen.

Embassies Under Fire: How Iran is Keeping US Diplomatic Missions On Battlefront

Posted on March 11, 2026 by Sridhar P

From a smoke-stained guard tower in Baghdad to a backpack bomb in Oslo and gunshots at dawn in Toronto, Iran has increasingly turned the world’s diplomatic consulates into combat zones.

The guard tower at the Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center had barely stopped smoking when the State Department alert went out Tuesday night. Six drones had been launched at the facility. Five were intercepted. The sixth found the tower. Somewhere inside the compound, a sprawling logistical hub near the Iraqi capital’s international airport that keeps America’s entire regional diplomatic operation running, a terse internal message ordered staff to “duck and cover,” noting that “accountability is ongoing.”

Nobody in the building was publicly confirmed hurt. Nobody claimed the strike officially. But the culprits, according to a U.S. security official who spoke without attribution, were almost certainly the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella network of Iran-funded and Iran-commanded armed factions that have been carrying out strikes on American positions since February 28th.

That was the day the United States and Israel jointly opened what Washington called Operation Epic Fury and Tel Aviv dubbed Operation Roaring Lion, a joint air strike that, within hours, had killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and gutted the country’s air defence network. Iran’s answer, in the 11 days since, has been to bring the fight somewhere the Pentagon cannot so easily track on radar: the front doors of American embassies, consulates, and diplomatic compounds scattered across four continents.

THE SCORECARD: 11 DAYS OF ATTACKS ON DIPLOMATIC TARGETS

Feb 28 – Baghdad Green Zone — Katyusha rockets; U.S. Embassy, all consular services suspended.

Mar 1–2 Karachi, Pakistan — U.S. Consulate stormed; U.S. Marines fire on demonstrators.

Mar 2–3 Kuwait City — U.S. Embassy hit by drone; smoke reported; operations fully suspended Mar 5.

Mar 3 – Erbil, Iraq — U.S. Consulate and airport area struck; black smoke visible; consulate closed.

Mar 3–4 Dubai, UAE — U.S. Consulate targeted; six people injured by intercepted drone debris in Abu Dhabi.

Mar 3–5 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia — U.S. Embassy hit despite Saudi-Iran 2023 normalisation deal.

Mar 4–5 Bahrain — U.S. Navy Fifth Fleet HQ targeted; 75 missiles and 123 drones intercepted over five days.

Mar 5 Doha, Qatar — Voluntary departure ordered; 10 IRGC cell members arrested by Qatari authorities.

Mar 7 Baghdad Green Zone — Four Katyusha rockets hit the Green Zone; C-RAM systems engage.

Mar 8 Oslo, Norway — Backpack bomb detonates at U.S. Embassy consular entrance at 1 a.m.

Mar 8 Beirut, Lebanon — Israeli strike on Ramada Hotel kills four Iranian diplomats.

Mar 9 Toronto, Canada — Gunmen open fire on U.S. Consulate from a white Honda SUV at 4:30 a.m.

Mar 9 Liege, Belgium — Bomb explodes at synagogue; Iranian proxy network involvement suspected.

Mar 10 Baghdad — Baghdad Diplomatic Support Center struck; one drone hits guard tower.

Why Different Kind of Battle Front?

What makes this campaign different from anything Iran has attempted before is scale and geography. Tehran has always maintained what intelligence agencies call a “forward deterrence” doctrine, using proxy forces in Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, and Gaza to keep the fight away from Iranian soil. But in 11 days, that doctrine has been turned outward, stretching from the Persian Gulf to Scandinavia to the Canadian lakeshore.

The numbers tell part of the story. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq alone claimed 67 separate drone and missile operations in the first three days. On Day Five, the IRGC announced it had fired 230 drones in a single coordinated wave at facilities hosting American troops across Iraq and Kuwait. Bahrain’s defence forces intercepted 75 missiles and 123 drones before the end of the first week. And still they kept coming.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell put the U.S. position in the clearest possible terms at a Tuesday briefing, saying American forces had now struck more than 5,000 targets inside Iran and were not finished. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, speaking the same morning, was clearly confident: “Today will be, yet again, our most intense day of strikes inside Iran,” he said. “The most fighters, the most bombers, the most strikes. Intelligence more refined, and better than ever.” One drone hit the guard tower in Baghdad roughly four hours later.

Four Dead at Ramada, And a Letter Nobody Read

On the morning of March 8th, an Israeli airstrike hit the Ramada Hotel in Beirut. Inside were four Iranian diplomats: Majid Hassani Qandesar, second secretary at the Tehran embassy in Lebanon; Ali Reza Biazar, third secretary; Hossein Ahmadlou, Iran’s military attaché; and Ahmad Rasouli, a military mission officer. All four were killed.

Iran had moved them to the hotel specifically because the Israeli military had already announced its intent to strike Iranian diplomatic personnel in Lebanon. The relocation had been formally notified to the Lebanese Foreign Ministry under the terms of the Vienna Convention. Iran’s position is that Israel knew exactly where those men were, that Lebanon had been officially informed, and that the strike was therefore a premeditated assassination dressed up as a military operation.

Tehran’s UN Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani sent a formal letter to Secretary-General António Guterres describing the strike as a criminal act and a fundamental breach of international protections afforded to diplomatic personnel. Iravani then went to the Security Council chamber and made the same argument to member states, accusing the Council of paralysis in the face of what he called an escalating pattern of impunity. The Council took note of his remarks and moved on to the next agenda item.

“The Council is turning a blind eye to this grave violation despite its primary responsibility under the UN Charter to maintain international peace and security,” said Iravani later.

Israel has not publicly commented on the specific targeting. Its broader position, maintained throughout the eleven days of operations, is that Iranian diplomatic cover in Lebanon has long served as camouflage for Quds Force commanders running operational networks against Israeli targets. Whether that justification holds under international law is a question being debated in academic journals and courtrooms that will take years to resolve. The four men at the Ramada will not see the verdict.

Oslo at 1 in the Morning

Two nights before the Toronto shooting, a backpack was left at the consular entrance of the United States Embassy in Oslo. It contained an improvised explosive device. The bomb detonated at approximately 1 a.m. on March 8th, causing minor structural damage to the entrance area and no injuries. Norwegian police launched an immediate investigation.

The timing, deep in the night, at a consular entry point, using a concealed device, carried the hallmarks of what European intelligence agencies have been tracking under the loose designation of Iran’s Foxtrot network: a series of clandestine proxy cells that, according to prior reporting by Swedish and Danish security services, have recruited members through criminal networks and social media platforms. The U.S. Embassy in Stockholm issued a warning about Iranian targeting operations through this network as far back as June 2025. In Oslo itself, a locally hired embassy guard had been convicted of espionage on behalf of Iranian intelligence just months earlier.

Norwegian Justice Minister Emilie Enger Mehl called the explosion unacceptable and said the government was treating it with the highest possible seriousness. No arrest had been made as of now.

4:30 A.M. in Toronto

There is a particular kind of message that gets sent when gunmen choose 4:30 in the morning. The street is empty, the target is symbolic, the intent is to terrify without the risk of immediate apprehension. That calculation was made outside the United States Consulate in downtown Toronto on the morning of March 9th, when two men in a white Honda SUV pulled to the kerb, opened fire at the building’s glass-and-steel facade, and drove away. Nobody inside was hurt. The glass, as Toronto Police Deputy Chief Frank Barredo dryly noted, is reinforced.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney called it a reprehensible act and an attempt at intimidation, expressing relief that there had been no casualties. Ontario Premier Doug Ford did not traffic in diplomatic language. Speaking to reporters, he said he was personally convinced that Iran had activated sleeper cells across North America and that the Toronto shooting was not an isolated incident. “We have to weed these people out and hold them accountable,” he said. “This is my personal opinion and I don’t think I’m too far off with saying that. It’s a different world now.”

In the days surrounding the shooting, two Toronto synagogues were also targeted by gunmen. An Iranian-Canadian boxing club was attacked. RCMP Chief Superintendent Chris Leather, heading the national security investigation, was careful to keep his language measured but acknowledged the self-evident: “Diplomatic premises everywhere,” he said, “currently warrant a sharply elevated level of vigilance.

I believe there are sleeper cells all over the world. They are in the U.S., they are in Canada. We have to weed these people out. It’s a different world now.

Washington’s number game

General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, told a Tuesday briefing that ballistic missile attacks originating from Iran had dropped by 90 percent since hostilities began and that one-way drone attacks had fallen by 83 percent. Hegseth called this strong evidence of military degradation. The inference he wanted reporters to draw was clear: “the campaign is working, Iran is running out of capacity, and the trajectory is toward resolution.”

Tehran’s newly installed parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf rejected any such reading on the same day, while senior official Ali Larijani posted a direct message to Donald Trump on social media: “Iran doesn’t fear your empty threats.” Trump, meanwhile, had issued his own posts warning that “any Iranian mines found in the Strait of Hormuz would trigger consequences at a level… never seen before.” The Strait remains effectively shut to commercial shipping.

A Quinnipiac University poll conducted over the preceding weekend found that roughly seven in ten registered American voters were worried the war would push energy prices higher, including approximately half of all Republican respondents. Gas stations in the Midwest were already showing it.

Ground Reality

The State Department’s formal tally as of Tuesday: nonessential personnel ordered out of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, the UAE, and the consulate in Adana, Turkey. Emergency departure assistance extended to approximately 23,000 private American citizens across the region. Secretary of State Marco Rubio waived the standard legal requirement for evacuees to reimburse the government for charter transport costs, a small procedural detail that signals how seriously Washington is treating the threat level.

In Iraq, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani publicly condemned the militia attacks as violations of his country’s sovereignty, a statement that would have carried more weight had his government the capacity to enforce it. The International Zone in Baghdad, which houses the U.S. Embassy along with dozens of other diplomatic missions, is now effectively sealed. The U.S. Consulate in Erbil has suspended all services. Al Jazeera correspondent Assed Baig, reporting from the Kurdish capital, put it plainly: “All these attacks taking place overnight and early this morning highlight how increasingly Iraq is becoming a battleground in this widening Middle East war.”

In Iran itself, the internet has been down for the better part of ten days. Cybersecurity monitoring group NetBlocks recorded the shutdown at over 240 consecutive hours by Tuesday, describing it as among the most severe government-imposed nationwide blackouts ever documented. Tens of thousands of civilians have left Tehran and other major cities for rural areas and family farms. A Tehran-based lawyer, speaking anonymously to an international broadcaster, described Basij paramilitaries in her neighbourhood as heavily armed and watching for any sign of domestic unrest even as bombs continued to fall.

Back in Baghdad, the smoke above the guard tower had cleared by nightfall Tuesday. The State Department alert remained the same. “Accountability,” is “ongoing.” Whether that accountability ever catches up with the drones, the backpacks, the drive-by shootings, and the hotel strikes is the question that eleven days of war have so far left entirely open.

US Energy Sec Chris Wright Quietly Deletes X Post on Navy Escorting Oil Tankers Cross Strait of Hormuz

Posted on March 11, 2026 by Sridhar P

U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright posted on X a little earlier today stating that the U.S Navy had escorted an oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, which is strategically important, in order to effectively guarantee that oil continued to flow into the world markets. The post was removed soon and it caused some confusion and quick backlash in the current U.S.-Israeli war against Iran.

The message that has been deleted mentioned that the Navy escort had done so to make sure that oil keeps flowing to world markets, as various sources and screenshots that were posted on social media confirm. The reason why Wright deleted the post is not clear, although the news outlets such as Reuters and others reported that no such escort operation had occurred. The U.S. Department of Defense and Central Command did not promptly confirm any escort operation and the claim to the passing of the Fox News was described by the military sources as not conforming to the reality.

Chris Wright

The conflict comes at a very sensitive moment when the traffic of tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman through which about 20 percent of all the seaborne oil in the world passes, has been hard hit. Shipping has been much curbed by the skyrocketing war risk insurance rates, Iranian threats to attack ships, and a general caution among shipowners. Recent reports show that hundreds of tankers anchored or rerouted and some estimates show that millions of barrels of oil are trapped in the Persian Gulf.

The Revolutionary Guards of Iran were quick to disown the assertion. Spokesman Alimohammad Naini, who was quoted by the state media, termed it as a total lie and threatened to counter any movements of the U.S. or any other allied fleet with missiles and drones. Our missiles and drones will intercept any action of the US fleet and allies, said Naini.

Iran Puts Conditions Galore

It had the ability to momentarily affect the oil markets and some of the reports indicated that the prices dropped and then rose again above $80 per barrel as the deletion and the denials happened. This is after Wright had made previous remarks on TV that he minimized immediate dangers and that U.S. military activities were undermining the capacities of Iran to threaten shipping, and that flows would be restored soon again, possibly with naval escorts.

According to satellite and tracking information, the number of vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz has reduced drastically since at the beginning of March and most of the tankers are concentrated in the relatively safer waters off the UAE and Oman.

The erasure has given rise to the speculation of miscommunication or prematureity in the administration since the administration of President Trump has indicated a number of times that it was willing to offer the protection of the commercial shipping should the conditions be in favor of it. But analysts observe that the masses of escorts are logistically difficult and dangerous considering the asymmetric threats of Iran. The trend highlights how unstable the world energy markets are during the conflict, as the oil prices fluctuate and the economic effects of the conflict continue to accumulate across the globe. More amendments are likely to follow with the Pentagon and the White House rectifying the discrepancy.

When Trump Came for Everyone With Tariffs, China Fought, Europe Flinched, Japan Bowed; India Simply Walked Away

Posted on March 9, 2026 by Sridhar P

There is a test that powerful countries administer to everyone else every few decades. It is not announced formally. There is no letter, no ceremony, no official notice. The test arrives disguised as a trade policy. You discover you are being tested only by watching how you respond.

Trump administered that test in 2025. The tariffs were the instrument. The real question underneath them was simpler and older: how much humiliation will you absorb to keep America happy?

Every major economy answered differently. The answers were more revealing than any diplomatic communiqué.

China Bled First, Then Negotiated

China did what China always does when cornered. It hit back.

The moment Trump’s tariffs landed, Beijing retaliated, hard, fast, and with surgical precision aimed at the American constituencies that hurt most. Agriculture. Soybeans. Pork. The farmers in Iowa and Kansas who had voted for the man now watching their export markets evaporate. Bilateral tariff rates escalated rapidly until both sides were effectively taxing each other’s goods at 125 per cent, a trade war in everything but name, conducted with the cold efficiency of two countries that understand leverage.

It lasted months. It cost both sides real money. And then, in May 2025, they sat down and cut a deal, tariffs rolled back to ten per cent, a 90-day truce extended in August, formalised for a full year by November.

China did not get everything it wanted. But it negotiated from a position of demonstrated willingness to inflict pain. Washington knew, going into those talks, that Beijing had already shown it could make the phone ring in congressional offices across the Farm Belt. That knowledge shaped every sentence of the agreement.

You do not get a good deal by being easy to ignore.

Canada Went Loud, Then Went Quiet

Canada’s response was emotional, immediate, and very Canadian, which is to say it was righteous, noisy, and ultimately pragmatic.

Within hours of Trump’s announcement, Prime Minister Trudeau slapped 25 per cent retaliatory tariffs on $155 billion worth of American goods. Ontario pulled every bottle of American alcohol from government-run liquor shelves. Provincial premiers held press conferences. The phrase “economic sovereignty” appeared in Canadian newspapers approximately ten thousand times in a single week.

Then, by June, Canada paused further retaliation and entered negotiations. The shelves were quietly restocked. The trade talks ground on behind closed doors, away from the cameras that had captured all the initial fury.

Canada had made its point. It had shown it was not a pushover. It had then returned to the business of being America’s largest trading partner and closest neighbour, because geography and economics do not pause for diplomatic theatre.

The noise was genuine. So was the accommodation that followed. Canada fought for its dignity and then negotiated for its interests. Both things can be true simultaneously.

Europe Built Its Weapons and Never Used Them

The European Union spent much of 2025 in a state that can only be described as armed paralysis.

Brussels prepared retaliatory lists covering nearly €72 billion of American goods. It drafted legislation activating the Anti-Coercion Instrument — a legal mechanism designed specifically for moments like this one. It threatened to go after American services, American tech platforms, American financial firms operating within EU borders. The paperwork was meticulous. The political will was not.

Europe blinked. Repeatedly. Quietly. Without ever formally announcing that it had blinked.

The reasons were not difficult to identify. European economies depend on American markets to a degree that makes genuine trade war genuinely painful. And Europe’s dependence on Washington’s military support for Ukraine, a war being fought on European soil, paid for partly with American weapons, meant that Brussels could not afford to turn a trade dispute into an alliance crisis. Trump knew this. He had always known it. The tariffs on Europe were, in part, a test of exactly that dependency.

Europe failed the test by passing on the opportunity to take it. It armed itself thoroughly and then stood very still, hoping the moment would pass.

It mostly did. The cost was invisible but real, the credibility of the threat had been spent without anything to show for it.

Japan Bent the Knee and Got a Discount

Japan’s response was, in historical context, entirely unsurprising. It notified the World Trade Organisation of its intent to suspend concessions on steel, aluminium, automobiles and parts. It made the appropriate official noises. Then it negotiated.

Tokyo’s instinct, refined across a century and a half of managing the American relationship, through gunboat diplomacy and occupation and Nixon’s triple shocks and Bush’s dinner table incident, is always to find the accommodation rather than force the confrontation. Japan reached a trade agreement setting tariffs on its goods, including automobiles, at 15 per cent. Significantly below the 25 per cent that had been threatened. Meaningfully better than nothing.

Japan conceded. Japan got a discount. Japan went home.

There is no contempt in that observation. Japan’s circumstances, 54,000 American troops on its soil, an American-authored pacifist constitution embedded in its foundational law, a security architecture built entirely around the US-Japan alliance, leave Tokyo with genuinely limited room to manoeuvre. Japan knows this. Washington knows Japan knows this. The discount was the acknowledgement that Japan had been a cooperative subject.

A discount is not the same as respect. But it is what cooperative subjects receive.

Brazil Made Speeches

Brazil’s President Lula gave several impassioned addresses about sovereignty, fairness, the rights of developing nations, and the injustice of a global trading system designed by the powerful for the powerful. The speeches were good. They were well-delivered. They contained several genuinely quotable passages.

Brazil did not fire a single retaliatory shot.

Not one.

It evaluated potential measures. It confirmed willingness to negotiate. It reserved its position. It talked loudly, at length, and carried nothing at all.

And Then There Comes India

India did not retaliate. It did not make speeches. It did not prepare retaliatory lists it never used or schedule press conferences to announce tariffs it never imposed.

It filed a WTO challenge, a legal mechanism, quiet and procedural, that signalled disagreement without escalation. It absorbed the blow. And then it got on with its own business, which turned out to be rather more interesting than anything Washington had planned for it.

When Trump publicly claimed credit for mediating the India-Pakistan ceasefire after the May 2025 conflict, India rejected the claim flatly. No US role in the military negotiations, New Delhi said. Full stop. No diplomatic softening. No grateful hedging.

When Trump claimed India had agreed to slash its duties to zero, purchase $500 billion in American goods, and stop buying Russian oil entirely, Indian authorities confirmed none of it. Oxford Economics described the claims as unrealistic. India said nothing publicly and kept buying Russian oil, which it had been doing all along, which it continued doing through February 2026, and for which it eventually received a waiver from the very Treasury Department that had spent months punishing it for exactly this behaviour.

When Trump intensified outreach to Pakistan, even as he was hitting India with 50 per cent tariffs, India noted the irony and said nothing.

When the EU came calling, India signed what European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called the “mother of all deals” — a trade agreement delivering an estimated €30 billion in export gains for both sides, accompanied by a defence pact. Modi then signalled warming relations with China. Precisely the strategic drift that Washington’s tariff pressure had been designed to prevent was happening, visibly, in full public view.

India’s exports to the US dipped 12 per cent in the final quarter of 2025. India’s economy grew 8.2 per cent in the same period, driven by its domestic market, which is large enough to not need Washington’s permission to function.

The tariff eventually came down to 18 per cent in the February 2026 truce. Trump announced it as a triumph. India accepted it as a correction.

What the Answers Tell You

China showed that if you make the cost of the tariff high enough, Washington will negotiate. Canada showed that you can be angry and practical simultaneously. Europe showed that a threat only works if you are willing to pull the trigger. Japan showed that a century of accommodation produces a discount, not dignity. Brazil showed that rhetoric unaccompanied by action is indistinguishable from silence.

India showed something different. It showed that a country large enough, confident enough, and strategically patient enough does not need to choose between fighting and submitting. It can simply decline to play on those terms, grow its economy, sign deals with other partners, wait for the logic of geography and demography to reassert itself, and let Washington eventually arrive at the conclusion India had been sitting on all along.

Trump came for India with tariffs, public insults, selective punishment, and demands that India manage its energy policy according to American geopolitical convenience. India filed a WTO complaint, kept buying Russian oil, grew at 8.2 per cent, signed a landmark deal with Europe, and waited.

China fought. Canada shouted. Europe trembled. Japan bowed. Brazil talked.

India walked away.

And Washington eventually followed when it conceded Russian oil for India amid Iran war.

Trump Called Starmer ‘No Churchill’ But History Has a Different Tale for Trump, Unfolding in Iran

Posted on March 9, 2026 by Sridhar P

Donald Trump has a Churchill problem. Not the kind he thinks.

When British Prime Minister Keir Starmer hesitated to open UK military bases for the Iran strikes last week, Trump was furious. Standing in the Oval Office beside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, he delivered his verdict on the special relationship in nine words: “This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with.”

The implication was clear. Churchill would have said yes immediately, bombed enthusiastically, and never flinched. Starmer — cautious, legalistic, quietly horrified — was cast as the timid contrast to the great wartime bulldog.

But here is what Trump’s Churchill invocation leaves out: the real Churchill didn’t just bomb his enemies. He also tried to talk to them. He negotiated. He built alliances painstakingly. He worried constantly about unintended consequences. He wrote, after witnessing the Boer War as a young officer, that once the signal for conflict was given, statesmen lose control of events.

That warning has aged remarkably well. It is, in fact, the story of the past ten days.

“I Got Him Before He Got Me”

The strikes that killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on February 28 were not framed by the White House in the language of grand strategy. Trump was more direct than that. “I got him before he got me,” he told ABC News, referencing Iranian-backed plots to assassinate him during the 2024 election cycle. In a separate conversation with The Atlantic, he admitted that Iran had offered significant concessions in the final round of nuclear talks — but that his recent military successes, including the capture of Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro, had made him feel he could demand more. “A year ago, it would have been great to accept that deal,” he said. “But we have become spoiled.”

Personal vendetta and military overconfidence, in other words, sat alongside any strategic calculation. The killing of Khamenei was, by Trump’s own account, partly about scores settled.

Then the consequences arrived — exactly as they always do.

The Heir Nobody Wanted, the Oil Shock Nobody Needed

Within nine days of Khamenei’s death, his son Mojtaba was installed as Supreme Leader. Brent crude punched above $114 a barrel. The Strait of Hormuz — through which roughly one fifth of the world’s daily oil supply travels — was effectively sealed. Iran kept launching missiles, now with the new supreme leader’s name inscribed on the warheads.

The regime did not crumble. It promoted from within and kept shooting.

This outcome was not unforeseeable. In fact, it was predicted — repeatedly, by historians, strategists, and the kind of sober analysts Trump tends to dismiss. The belief that removing one man from the top of a hostile state will unravel that state is among the most persistent and most thoroughly disproven assumptions in modern warfare. It doesn’t matter how precisely the strike is executed. The system underneath simply replaces whoever falls.

Yamamoto died over the Solomon Islands in 1943, shot down by American fighters after US codebreakers intercepted his travel plans. Japan kept fighting for two more years. Saddam Hussein survived the opening “decapitation strike” of the Iraq War, and when he was eventually caught, dishevelled and hiding underground, the country did not stabilise — it fractured along lines that bled for the next two decades. The CIA tried to kill Fidel Castro at least eight times between 1960 and 1965, deploying methods ranging from poison pills to an exploding cigar. Castro outlasted ten American presidents.

None of these precedents stopped Trump. None of them ever stop anyone, which is precisely the point.

What Churchill Actually Believed

Trump invoked Churchill as the archetype of resolve — the leader who never hesitated, never lawyered, never blinked. The historical record is more complicated.

Churchill’s actual strategic philosophy, documented across decades of speeches, memoirs and private correspondence, rested on a specific combination: negotiate from positions of strength, but always keep channels of communication open with adversaries. Even during the Cold War, at the height of his anxieties about Soviet power, he pursued the idea that western strength might eventually bring Moscow to the table. Firmness and diplomacy were, in his mind, not opposites but partners.

He was also deeply clear-eyed about Iran specifically. Churchill had attended the 1943 Tehran Conference, sitting between Roosevelt and Stalin as allied leaders carved up wartime arrangements. He emerged sobered, aware that Iran sat at the intersection of competing great-power interests and that interventions there carried long historical tails. A decade later, the Anglo-American coup that toppled Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953 — in which Churchill’s government was intimately involved — produced exactly the kind of unintended consequence he feared: it handed the Islamic Republic its founding grievance, a story of western interference that the regime has weaponised for legitimacy ever since.

Trump’s Churchill, in other words, is a simplified cartoon of the man — the bulldog without the brain, the fighter stripped of the diplomat.

A War Trump Is Now Fighting Alone

The Churchill jibe has also exposed something Trump didn’t intend to reveal: just how isolated the United States is in this war.

After a year of tariff threats, diplomatic insults, and the systematic alienation of European partners, Trump launched a major military operation with only Israel beside him. Britain eventually allowed limited use of its bases for defensive strikes, but drew a clear legal boundary around wider involvement. France’s Emmanuel Macron declared the strikes illegal under international law. Spain barred American military planes from its jointly operated bases in Andalusia — and received a trade war threat in response. NATO intercepted an Iranian missile near Turkish airspace, but the alliance has moved carefully to avoid being dragged deeper in.

“This is not Winston Churchill we’re dealing with,” Trump said of Starmer. The irony is that Churchill’s entire doctrine of Western power rested on precisely the alliances Trump has spent years eroding.

The War That Was Supposed to End Quickly

Trump told ABC News the Iran operation could last weeks. He demanded Iran’s “unconditional surrender” on social media. He said the strike had been so successful it had killed most of the post-Khamenei candidates he had identified — “second or third place is dead” — as if the problem of Iranian governance could be resolved by eliminating enough people on a list.

At least 1,230 Iranians have been killed since the strikes began, according to the Iranian Red Crescent. Over 120 died in Lebanon. Ten Israelis have been killed by Iranian attacks. Oil is above $114 a barrel. Asian markets recorded their worst single session since the COVID crash of 2020. Mojtaba Khamenei is firing missiles under his own name.

Churchill wrote, reflecting on a lifetime of wars, that once the signal for conflict is given, statesmen lose control of events. That insight didn’t make him a pacifist. It made him careful.

Trump saw Churchill and thought: warrior. History offers a fuller picture — a man who understood that the hardest part of any war is not the killing. It is knowing what you want the morning after.

That morning is arriving in Tehran now. The question of what comes next has no clear answer. And the man who ordered the strike, confident and unilateral, is discovering what every leader who has walked this road before him eventually discovers:

Decapitation is easy. What follows is not.

Sensex Falls 1,097 Points, Nifty Down 315 as Iran Crisis Rattles Markets, Oil Above $100 per Barrel

Posted on March 9, 2026 by Sridhar P

Escalating tensions involving Iran have unsettled global financial markets, with Indian equities and the rupee facing pressure as investors react to rising crude oil prices and geopolitical uncertainty in West Asia.

Domestic benchmark indices slipped sharply in recent sessions as risk sentiment weakened. The BSE Sensex fell about 1,097 points, or 1.4 per cent, to close at 78,918.90, while the Nifty 50 dropped 315 points, or 1.3 per cent, to settle at 24,450.45 as investors turned cautious amid the growing geopolitical crisis.

The broader trend during the week also reflected heightened volatility. The Sensex recorded a weekly decline of about 3.08 per cent, tracking weakness in global markets as oil prices climbed amid concerns about potential disruptions to energy supplies from the Middle East.

For India, the primary risk from the Iran crisis lies in crude oil. Brent crude prices surged sharply, at one point rising above $100 per barrel for the first time in nearly four years as the Iran conflict escalated and Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei was chosen as supreme leader.

WTI crude was trading at $108.66, up $17.76 or 19.54%, while Brent crude was at $108.69, up $16.00 or 17.26%, as traders priced in the possibility that an escalation could affect shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial maritime route for global energy trade.

Heavily Dependent on Oil Imports

India is particularly vulnerable to such shocks because of its heavy dependence on imported oil. The country imports more than 85 per cent of its crude oil requirements, meaning any sustained rise in prices can quickly increase the import bill, put pressure on the rupee and add to inflationary concerns.

Market participants say geopolitical tensions have already injected volatility into equities, with investors shifting to safer assets while trimming exposure to riskier markets.

Ponmudi R., CEO of Enrich Money, said investors should brace for continued swings in the market as geopolitical developments unfold. He said “the week ahead is likely to remain volatile” as tensions in the Middle East continue to shape investor sentiment.

Sectoral impacts are expected to vary depending on exposure to crude oil and global trade flows. Industries that rely heavily on fuel or petrochemical inputs — such as aviation, paints and chemicals — could face pressure on margins if oil prices remain elevated. On the other hand, energy producers and some defence-linked companies could see gains as commodity prices rise and geopolitical tensions increase.

Strait of Hormuz Poses Real Challenge

Another key concern for India is the security of shipping routes. A large share of India’s crude imports passes through the Strait of Hormuz, making any disruption in that corridor a major risk for the economy. Even the threat of disruption can push up insurance and freight costs, raising expenses for importers and exporters alike.

Global investor sentiment has also turned more cautious as the crisis deepens. Analysts note that Indian equity markets have already fallen about 4 per cent within two days of the conflict escalating, underscoring how quickly geopolitical shocks can reverberate through financial markets.

Veteran investor Jim Rogers warned that oil prices could climb further if the conflict intensifies. He said crude “could definitely cross $100 a barrel again” if geopolitical tensions escalate.

Despite the immediate volatility, market observers say the long-term impact on Indian equities will depend on how prolonged the crisis becomes. If tensions ease and oil prices stabilise, markets may recover. However, a prolonged conflict that disrupts energy supplies or shipping lanes could keep Indian markets under pressure in the weeks ahead.

Who Is Mojtaba Khamenei? The Shadow Cleric Who Became Supreme Leader of Iran, Why Trump Already Wants him dead?

Posted on March 9, 2026 by Sridhar P

Thirty years he had been the most powerful man in Iran ever to be seen.

No speeches. No sermons. No interviews. And, even as his father was roaring away in pulpits and making a name in the history of a nation, Mojtaba Khamenei was toiling in the shadows, pushing through corridors, whispering into the correct ears, pulling the right threads that wigged the whole clockwork of the Islamic Republic without ever leaving the slightest trace of them upon it.

On Sunday the shadow got into the light.

As a successor to his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who was killed in a joint US-Israel attack just nine days ago, Mojtaba Khamenei is currently the new Supreme Leader of one of the most heavily armed theocracies in the world. He is 56 years old. He has been sanctioned by the US since 2019. And Washington and Tel Aviv had succeeded in a few hours after his appointment to issue a public death warrant against him.

The Man Nobody Heard Coming

Mojtaba was born in 1969 in Mashhad as the second child of the Ayatollah. He had enlisted in the Revolutionary Guard in his teens in the Iran-Iraq War, pursued theology with his father in Qom and then did something uncharacteristic of a cleric with ambitions he went off to the gears of power instead of attempting to drive them in the limelight.

He had been the gatekeeper of his father over the course of decades. He controlled access to meetings and non-access. He established relationships among the most conservative branches of the IRGC. The kind of profile that was necessary in his case was the one that worked in subterranean deliberations between generals and clerics; this was already a mighty one.

His name was familiar to Iranian people. To the majority, he had never been heard.

What they were aware of and democracy activists have been screaming years ago, was that Mojtaba was the man behind the crackdown on the 2009 Green Movement, the bloody crackdown of hundreds of thousands of Iranians who flooded the streets following a contested election. Such demonstrations were systematically suppressed and brutally. Investigators say that his fingerprints were everywhere on it.

A Vote Held Under the Gun

The process of selection said it all about what Iran is going through. As the nation was at war, its skies still reeking of Israeli attacks, members of the Assembly of Experts, senior ones, were under heavy pressure by the IRGC commanders just before the vote was taken. The individuals who objected were allowed little time to speak. Discussion was cut short. The vote was called quickly.

The outcome was packaged instantly in the tone of rebellion. One of the members of the Assembly said that the new leader was selected specifically because he was a man that the enemy hated – a literal, intentional attack on Donald Trump, who had already referred to the appointment as unacceptable before it was even official.

Iran had chosen the man that America did not want. And they would have that people know it was done on purpose.

A Warning to the World, Which Trump Delivers Not Diplomatically Dressed

Washington was not subtle in his position. A few days prior to the vote, Trump was confrontational as usual when he spoke to the ABC News that Mojtaba would not be able to remain in power without American approval, and that without it he would not last long. In another interview, he rejected the younger Khamenei saying that he even had a father who was reportedly incompetent.

Israel was equally direct. The Israeli Defence Minister was quoted saying that the appointment also placed Mojtaba an instantaneous target to be killed.

The response of Iran was not verbal but in the shape of missiles. Soon after the announcement, the Iranian state television showed footage of another strike, that is, the projectiles, which, reports said had the inscription: At Your Command, Sayyid Mojtaba.

The new supreme leader was an heir of a war. The initial move that he made was to continue fighting it.

Why This Changes Means Everything

The decision of Mojtaba Khamenei informs you about something significant where the actual power of Iran currently lies. This is not a pragmatist. This is not a diplomat. It is a man who has spent his whole career within the bosom of the IRGC, a man whose instincts were developed not in the bargaining table but in the culture of violence and the inculcate of military obedience.

The appointment, analysts pay close attention to, indicates that the hardline security establishment of Iran has solidly established itself in power, and that the off-ramp of the ceasefire or diplomacy has indeed become even even more distant.

And to that, a Bloomberg investigation published earlier this year which has implicated Khamenei in an offshore financial system that goes across London, Dubai real estate, shipping, banking and the image that comes out is of a man who knows power in all its variants.

Iran has a new supreme leader. He is younger, tougher and more imbedded in the war machine than his father was. Trump has threatened to cause consequences. Israel has promised strikes. And the man to whom most Iranians had never heard a word spoken has already responded to them both, one missile at a time.

What is H-1B Visa? Complete Guide for Indians in 2026

Posted on March 9, 2026 by Sridhar P

H-1B Visa is both a golden ticket and a constant anxiety source to hundreds of thousands of Indians who study or work in the United States. It is the most common work visa in America but also happens to be one of the most disputed, most amended and most politically unstable immigration tools in the world. This is all you want to know in 2026 as the H1B visa window opens.

After the allegations of H1B visa misuse, US Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, has affirmed that the department was already starting its review of the program.

“Yes, we are. We are still engaged in such a review and will have it finished here in 2026,” Noem said when Senator Eric Schmitt pushed the department to the question of whether they will devote themselves to completing the reassessment in the year. Estimates show that nearly 600,000 Indian students and techies will be affected by any changes in H1B visa, which was designed to allow American firms to employ highly skilled foreign professionals including the international students, technology firms, and universities.

What Is the H-1B Visa?

The H-1B is a non-immigrant visa, through which US employers can temporarily hire foreign employees in positions of specialty, jobs that demand a bachelor’s degree or other equivalent degree in a specialty. The most common qualifying areas include technology, engineering, mathematics, medicine, accounting, and architecture. The visa is initially issued for three years which may be furthered to another three. The status of H-1B of an Indian applicant to the green card of the US is frequently extended over a long period of time, based on the green card backlog.

How H-1B Lottery Will be in 2026?

The US government annually provides 85,000 new H-1B visas, 65,000 under the annual limit and 20,000 under a masters (or higher) degree in the US. In case of the surpassing demand and supply, a lottery is done by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), an agency of the US Department of Homeland Security that administers the country’s naturalization and immigration system.

The FY2027 H-1B registration period was open from March 4 to 19. Registration fee is now US$215 per beneficiary which is a considerable increase compared to the previous $10. There was one major change that was implemented on February 27, 2026: USCIS substituted the previous random lottery with a weighted selection system. The higher wage level positions of the Department of Labor have more entries in the pool. A level IV gets four entries, level III gets three, level II gets two and level I gets one. This is fundamentally beneficial and advantageous to candidates sponsored to high-paying positions in senior positions.

How Many Indians Get H-1B Visas?

H-1B program is dominated by India. In FY2023, the Indians took up 68,825 initial H-1B visa approvals, 58 per cent of all approvals and 2.10 lakh extensions, 79 per cent of all extensions. There were 343,981 qualified registrations in the FY2026 lottery, 26.9% lower than FY2025, owing to the new beneficiary-centered system, which does not allow more than one employer to register a candidate.

2026 Warning: There are no slots to stamp visa

New slots in visa interviewing to stamp H-1B in the US consulates in India, Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad and Kolkata have been not changing during most of 2026. On X, Immigration attorney Emily Neumann wrote that she had not been seeing new slots in more than 50 days. It is not that they are in a hurry to issue you with a visa. They are attempting to reject visas whenever they get an opportunity. “It is a totally a new world compared to what was seen under the Biden administration,” she said. The H-1B who are in the US are not advised to travel to India to have their stamping until the status quo is improved.

What Will Go wrong in case you are not chosen?

Those candidates who are not picked during the first lottery are kept in the system to await the possibility of taking supplemental selections later in the year either in July or October. Contenders will only be eligible based on registration during the March window. As Senator Eric Schmitt refers to the abuse of H-1B as rampant and the DHS undertaking the entire program for review, Indian applicants and employers are advised to seek the services of an experienced immigration attorney long before the next registration window.

US Senator Flags H-1B Misuse: DHS Orders Full Review; What It Means for 600,000 Indian Techies

Posted on March 9, 2026 by Sridhar P

India is keenly following up the investigation of the US Department of Homeland Security on H-1B and OPT programs which are major immigration programs through which Indian technology professionals and students access the country.

Most H-1B visa are controlled by Indian nationals. According to the statistics of the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, 70-75 percent of successful H-1B applications are processed with Indians as the primary beneficiaries due to the requirements of the American technology companies and consultants. With the visa, US employers are able to recruit foreign talent in the areas of software engineering, data science, finance and biotechnology.

The H-1B program has been a primary entry point of Indian talent into the US technocratic industry. Big Indian companies, such as Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services, Wipro, and HCLTech, are the largest users, together with the US giant tech companies.

India’s Response to H1B Row

No fresh DHS or USCIS statements emerged tied directly to Schmitt’s “plea” or Senate oversight. However, related processing changes persist: premium processing fees increased effective March 1, 2026, and the FY 2027 H-1B registration window opened March 4–19, 2026, under the updated skills-based selection process (selections expected by March 31).

The Indian Ministry of External Affairs recently made detailed public comments on H-1B disruptions, following expanded social media vetting (effective December 15, 2025), which triggered mass rescheduling of consular interviews in India (many pushed from late 2025/early 2026 to mid-2026 or even 2027 in some cases).MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal (December 26, 2025 briefing) said: “The Government of India has received multiple representations from Indian nationals facing delays and difficulties in scheduling or rescheduling US visa appointments. While visa matters fall under the sovereign domain of the issuing country, India has raised these concerns with the US authorities in New Delhi and Washington DC.” He added that prolonged delays cause “hardship for families and children,” and India remains “actively engaged” with U.S. authorities to “minimize the impact on Indian nationals” and address disruptions.Current Practical Impact on Indian Applicants

Consular backlogs in India remain severe due to vetting layers (social media over 5 years required public, site visits, wage checks). Some January–March 2026 slots were deferred as far as 2027. No evidence of resolution or easing in early March.

No major regulatory changes to H-1B/OPT have been finalized yet as reviews remain ongoing. Indian tech firms and NASSCOM continue highlighting project delays. The Indian students may witness setbacks during the review due to the OPT program, which allows foreign students who complete their studies in US universities to remain and have a temporary work period. Most Indian students spend this period to have professional experience and then move on to other long term visas such as the H-1B.

A change in the policy towards these paths may extend throughout the Indian labour force in technology, its education sector overseas and remittance. America is still the number one destination of the Indian IT talents and the income of Indian employees to foreign markets is one of the largest contributors to the global remittances of the nation.

Although the Department of Homeland Security has not yet confirmed that the review would result in a change in the regulations, immigration experts fear that a tighter rule may impact thousands of Indian workers and students who plan their careers in the US technology market.

Israel Strikes Iran Oil Fields, Black Rain Envelopes Tehran; Breathing Problem Pervades

Posted on March 9, 2026 by Sridhar P

Thick black clouds covered the Tehran areas on Sunday with residents claiming that when it rains, oily residue fell onto the ground following Israeli airstrikes to various oil storage and fuel distribution sites around the Iranian capital that caused massive fires, causing plumes of smoke to fill the Iranian capital.

The attacks, which were declared late on Saturday, were directed to the oil storage tanks and fuel transfer stations in Tehran and the adjacent province of Alborz, as per Iranian media. There were also large mass fires and explosions observed in various areas because the combustible tanks emitted heavy smoke which covered big parts of the city.

The inhabitants reported about a weird dark rain that made the streets, automobiles and buildings black. This was found to be due to the mixing of soot, oil particles and other pollutants of the burning facilities with rain clouds as they swept over the capital.

Governments encouraged their citizens to remain at home and wear masks because of poor air quality. The environmental officials had cautioned that the smoke had hydrocarbons and other chemicals which might irritate the lungs and eyes.

“It is raining oil in Tehran this morning after major airstrikes on oil facilities in the south and west of the capital,” CNN correspondent Frederik Pleitgen wrote on social media.

Fars, an Iranian news agency reported that in the attacks, there were at least four oil storage depots and fuel transfer centres that were hit. There were local reports that a fuel facility was hit in the strikes killing several tanker drivers.

The assault is among the most major attacks on the Iranian energy infrastructure since the present stage of the conflict commenced towards the end of the previous month. Israel has indicated that its military activities are to undermine the strategic and military power of Iran.

Oil Pivotal in Iran Vs US-Israel Conflict

The Iranian leadership has threatened to take revenge as the tension in the region keeps building up. The escalating conflict has already had an impact on shipping operations in the Strait of Hormuz which is one of the most important oil transit routes globally.

“The world is watching the Strait of Hormuz closely because any disruption there immediately sends shockwaves through global oil markets,” one energy market analyst said.

Any kind of disturbance in the Strait of Hormuz has become a global obsession due to the fact that any kind of disruption will automatically cause ripples to the oil markets in the world, as one of the energy market analysts remarked.

To the people of Tehran, though, the burning issues are the smog that stands over the city and the strange black rain that ensued the night of the explosions and fire. Officials reported that the air quality monitoring would be ongoing when emergency personnel tried to contain the fires and know the damage.

Amid Iran Tensions, US Asks India To Absorb Russian Oil Meant For China; What The Proposal Means For India?

Posted on March 9, 2026 by Sridhar P

• US suggested India absorb Russian oil waiting for Chinese refineries
• Over 100 million barrels of crude currently floating offshore
• Extra cargoes could benefit Indian refiners through discounted supply
• Move aimed at cooling global oil prices amid Middle East tensions

The United States has proposed that India reflect on absorbing over 100 million barrels of Russian oil which is already offshore to be transported to refineries in China, which Washington reckons will assist in alleviating the soaring oil prices amidst the threats of violence in the Middle East.

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright said the suggestion was part of a short-term effort by the Trump administration to stabilise energy markets unsettled by disruptions in the Middle East. Speaking in television interviews on CNN and CBS News, Wright said senior US officials had directly raised the idea with New Delhi.

“I did call up the Indians, as did Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent,” Wright said, noting that a large volume of Russian oil is currently idling at sea while waiting to be processed by Chinese refineries. According to Wright, more than 100 million barrels of Russian crude are effectively stuck in a queue offshore because of limited unloading capacity in China.

The proposal, he said, was to divert those cargoes to Indian refineries instead of leaving them anchored for weeks.

“Instead of having it wait six weeks to unload there, let’s just pull that oil forward, have it land at Indian refineries and tamp this fear of shortage of oil, tamp the price spikes and the concerns we see in the marketplace,” Wright said.

“This is simply a pragmatic step with a short time horizon,” Wright said. The US official emphasised that the outreach to India does not signal any shift in Washington’s broader policy toward Moscow.

“The United States’ policy towards Russia has not changed,” Wright said when asked whether the move contradicts Western efforts to reduce reliance on Russian energy.

Wright added that the global oil market remains fundamentally well supplied and that recent price spikes are largely driven by uncertainty rather than an actual shortage.

“The world is very well supplied with oil right now,” he said.

Tanker movement through the Strait of Hormuz, a key artery for global oil shipments, has begun to resume following disruptions linked to the Iran conflict, although traffic remains below normal levels.

“We’re nowhere near normal traffic right now, and it will take some time,” Wright said, adding that any disruption is likely to last weeks rather than months.

What It Means For India?

India has become one of the biggest purchasers of discounted Russian crude since the war in Ukraine changed the global energy trade in 2022. The Russian oil is currently taking up approximately a 1/3rd of the crude imports into India and assists Indian refiners to obtain supplies at prices which are usually lower than those of the producers found in the Middle East.

Should the Indian refiners intervene and absorb some of the oil that is already awaiting China, this may contribute to alleviating congestion in global supply chains and avoid another round of crude prices soaring. Analysts opine that more discounted cargoes may also enhance the company refining margins of companies like Indian Oil Corp, Reliance Industries and Nayara Energy, which have increased their consumption of Russian crude in the last three years.

Nevertheless, the concept is not fully unproblematic.

The refining system already used in India has the capacity to process the blend of crude grades and the high volume would require a larger refinery capacity, logistics and contracts in place. The shipping routes and insurance arrangements may also come into play especially with the complicated system of sanctions on Russian energy exports.

New Delhi has always justified its energy buying decisions with Russia by saying that it is vital to buy low-cost gas to support its economy. Indian officials have reiterated on several occasions that the country would purchase oil anywhere it could at good prices.

In the case of international markets, the diversion of cargoes that is lying offshore may assist in abating the so-called fear premium which has increased the oil prices in the recent Middle East tensions.

In the case of India, however, the scenario may provide it with another opportunity to consolidate its as one of the most versatile and opportunistic purchasers in the rapidly divided energy market.

H-1B Visa Abuse: US Visa Program Under DHS Review, says Senator Schmitt

Posted on March 8, 2026 by Sridhar P

The issue of how some of the major U.S. job-visa programmes are operating was raised in a Senate oversight hearing this week. Much of this was alleged by Republican Senator Eric Schmitt to have been in misuse through programs like the H -1B visa and the Optional Practical Training (OPT). The hearing triggered the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to affirm that it is undertaking a formal review of the student work program.

Presenting his argument to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Schmitt stated that the H-1B visa program, which was designed to allow American firms to employ highly skilled foreign professionals, was being misused more often, posing a threat to the employment opportunities of the U.S. workers.

“For those listening, the H-1B programme was marketed as a programme to bring in the best and the brightest for jobs that we don’t have people for,” Schmitt said. “What’s happening is this abuse, is that American citizens are being displaced by cheaper, more obedient foreign labour.”

Schmitt claimed that there are those employers who take advantage of the apply to reduce the cost of getting a specialized talent to get cheaper labor. The senator explained that the American citizens are getting forced out by cheaper foreign labor that is more obedient.

Schmitt also attacked the OPT program that international students studying in the U.S. can stay and work in a restricted number of years after the completion of their academic programs. The senator says that the policy has developed to have lopsided incentives to universities and employers. He pointed out that some of the institutions are becoming more and more dependent on foreign students, in part due to employment offers attached to OPT. He characterized the system as successfully serving as “visa mills for universities taking away opportunities for American students because they don’t have to pay taxes on the foreign labour for at least a year if you have this visa for OPT.”

Schmitt claimed that he had sent a letter to DHS requesting a formal examination of not only the H-1B program but also applicable scope and length of work authorization on the program of optional training. In response at the hearing, Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, affirmed that the department was already starting its review of the programs. “Yes, we are. We are still engaged in such a review and will have it finished here in 2026, Noem said. Schmitt pushed the department to the question of whether they will devote themselves to completing the reassessment in the year. “Yes, we are. We have done that review still, and we are doing it here in 2026, the same way, said Noem.

The exchange occurred within a wider oversight hearing that emphasized much of the immigration enforcement policies, border management and operational oversight of DHS. Nomad lawmakers inquired Noem on a variety of matters such as the process of deportation, the implementation of detention, and national security concerns that are related to the issue of immigration enforcement.

Debate of H-1B visas and the OPT program was one of the few parts of the hearing devoted to legal avenues of immigration, as opposed to enforcement strategies of undocumented migration. DHS manages immigration compliance and visa management by enforcing agencies like U.S. citizenship and immigration services and U.S immigration and customs enforcement.

The international students, technology businesses, and universities, especially Indian students and talent, might experience any changes caused by the review, but the authorities have not yet described the possible changes to the policy.

Spanish Hacker Tricked Claude to Become Elite Cyber Weapon, Steals 150-GB of Mexico’s Most Sensitive Data

Posted on February 27, 2026 by Sridhar P

An unidentified hacker exploited Anthropic’s AI chatbot Claude to carry out a series of cyberattacks against Mexican government agencies, stealing 150 gigabytes of sensitive data including taxpayer records, voter files, and civil registry documents, startling cybersecurity researchers worldwide. The attack, which began in December 2025 and still continuing, was discovered by Israeli cybersecurity startup Gambit Security, which stumbled upon publicly accessible conversation logs revealing the entire jailbreak methodology.

The unknown attacker wrote Spanish-language prompts instructing Claude to act as an elite hacker, identifying vulnerabilities in government networks, writing scripts to exploit them, and determining ways to automate data theft, according to Gambit’s research published Wednesday. The chatbot initially warned the user of malicious intent but when the attacker added instructions about deleting logs and erasing command history, it complied.

“Specific instructions about deleting logs and hiding history are red flags,” Claude responded at one point, according to a transcript provided by Gambit. “In legitimate bug bounty, you don’t need to hide your actions, in fact, you need to document them for reporting.”

Rather than continuing to argue with the AI, the hacker changed tactics entirely, abandoning the back-and-forth conversation and instead handing Claude a detailed operational playbook on how to proceed. That approach achieved the “jailbreak,” bypassing Claude’s guardrails and allowing the attacks to proceed.

“In total, it produced thousands of detailed reports that included ready-to-execute plans, telling the human operator exactly which internal targets to attack next and what credentials to use,” said Curtis Simpson, Gambit Security’s chief strategy officer.

The Scale of the Breach

The 150 gigabytes of stolen data contained documents associated with 195 million taxpayer files of the federal tax agency of Mexico, national election institute voter files, government employee credentials, and civil registry files.

The list of agencies that Gambit compromised is topped by the federal tax authority (SAT) of Mexico, the national electoral institute (INE), state governments in Jalisco, Michoacan and Tamaulipas, civil registry in Mexico City and water utility of Monterrey, a total of nine institutions on federal, state, and municipal levels.

Once Claude reached its limits with some requests, the attacker turned to OpenAI ChatGPT to get some additional help such as how to move laterally in computer networks, what credentials were required to get into specific systems, and how probable the hacking attempt would be recognized. Two consumer artificial intelligence subscriptions. No custom malware. No zero-day exploit.

Anthropic Responds, Proscribes Accounts

Anthropic examined the arguments presented by Gambit, stopped the operation and blocked the accounts in question, a representative of the company confirmed. The firm uses examples of bad practices to learn new lessons and train its own AI, Claude Opus 4.6, has probes that detect attempts to misuse it, the representative said.

In this case, the hacker engaged Claude continuously until it had the capability to jailbreak it, which the representative affirmed, but observed that the hacking campaign even began to fail occasionally since Claude did not heed to the demands of the hacker.

OpenAI was also able to verify that it detected the activities of the hacker who was using its models to carry out activities that were against its usage policies. The company issued an emailed statement that said it had blocked the accounts that were used by this opponent and appreciated the efforts of the outreach by Gambit Security since its tools have not responded to their requests.

Mexican Government Pushes Back, Partially

Mexican authorities have had a mixed reaction. Mexico tax evasion authority confirmed that it had viewed its access logs and that it could not trace a breach. The national electoral institute claimed that no violations and unauthorized access were detected in the recent months, and that it enhanced its cybersecurity roadmap. Jalisco state government also denied being breached saying that federal networks were the only ones affected.

The national digital agency of Mexico did not provide any commentary on the breaches, only stating that cybersecurity was a priority. An official of Monterrey Water and Drainage Services indicated that the agency did not identify any intrusions or significant vulnerabilities after the second half of 2025. The civil registry of Mexico City, the local government of Michoacan and Tamaulipas did not provide any response to inquiries.

Mexican officials had issued a short statement in December stating that they were investigating violations by multiple institutions of the state, but it is still unknown whether that was connected to the Claude attack.

Not First Time, Not Last Either

Gambit has not mentioned that the attack must have been carried out by a particular group and indicated that it does not think that the attacker is affiliated to a foreign government. Researchers noted that the attacker was after a great amount of the identities of government employees, but it is still not very clear what the attacker did with the data he stole. The campaign used at least 20 specific vulnerabilities.

Claude has also not been the first time Mexican breach has been featured in a nation-level cyberattack. In November 2025, Anthropic announced that it had stopped the initial AI-directed cyber-espionage effort, where alleged Chinese state-sponsored cybercriminals had infiltrated Claude into targeting 30 global targets.

The 2026 Global Threat Report of the CrowdStrike company published Wednesday, Feb 25, 2026, reported a 89% year-over-year rise in the number of AI-enabled adversary activities and a mean of 29 minutes of average breakout time in eCrime cases, the shortest time of 27 seconds was recorded.

“This fact is transforming everything in the game rules that we have never heard of,” said Alon Gromakov, the co-founder and the chief executive officer of Gambit.

Gambit was established by Gromakov and two former officers of the signals intelligence unit of the Israel Defense Forces, Unit 8200. The research of Wednesday was published, and the company has recently raised a new round of $61 million led by Spark Capital, Kleiner Perkins and Cyberstarts.

For 195 million Mexican taxpayers whose records have been turned over to unknown hands, just what to do next is the question ahead.

India International Times

World News From Indian Perspective

Author Archives: Sridhar P

How moss led to the solving a grave-robbing mystery

One-third of Gen Z men agree a wife should obey husband, compared to Baby Boomers

A folding sheet robot that can deliver drugs with precision is here

Could a hot cup of matcha dial down the ‘sneeze switch’ in allergic rhinitis?

Report calls for AI toy safety standards to protect young children

Middle East and Global Energy Markets; Why is Strait of Hormuz so important?

DRDO, Indian Navy conduct trials of Air Droppable Container from P8I aircraft

What makes a hit? On Tiktok and Spotify, listeners only partly decide

Embassies Under Fire: How Iran is Keeping US Diplomatic Missions On Battlefront

US Energy Sec Chris Wright Quietly Deletes X Post on Navy Escorting Oil Tankers Cross Strait of Hormuz

When Trump Came for Everyone With Tariffs, China Fought, Europe Flinched, Japan Bowed; India Simply Walked Away

Trump Called Starmer ‘No Churchill’ But History Has a Different Tale for Trump, Unfolding in Iran

Sensex Falls 1,097 Points, Nifty Down 315 as Iran Crisis Rattles Markets, Oil Above $100 per Barrel

Who Is Mojtaba Khamenei? The Shadow Cleric Who Became Supreme Leader of Iran, Why Trump Already Wants him dead?

What is H-1B Visa? Complete Guide for Indians in 2026

US Senator Flags H-1B Misuse: DHS Orders Full Review; What It Means for 600,000 Indian Techies

Israel Strikes Iran Oil Fields, Black Rain Envelopes Tehran; Breathing Problem Pervades

Amid Iran Tensions, US Asks India To Absorb Russian Oil Meant For China; What The Proposal Means For India?

H-1B Visa Abuse: US Visa Program Under DHS Review, says Senator Schmitt

Spanish Hacker Tricked Claude to Become Elite Cyber Weapon, Steals 150-GB of Mexico’s Most Sensitive Data