President Murmu Highlights Welfare, Women, Tribal Schemes In Republic Day Address

President Droupadi Murmu on Saturday outlined the government’s flagship welfare, financial inclusion and social empowerment programmes, positioning them as central to India’s development strategy as the country prepares to mark Republic Day 2026.

In her address to the nation, Murmu said targeted schemes aimed at women, farmers, tribal communities, the poor and youth were reshaping economic participation and strengthening the social foundation of the republic.

The President highlighted the impact of the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao campaign in improving access to education for girls, calling it a key driver of women’s empowerment. She said national efforts in health, education, safety and economic inclusion were expanding women’s participation across sectors.

Murmu also pointed to the scale of financial inclusion under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, under which more than 57 crore bank accounts have been opened so far, with women accounting for nearly 56% of the total. She said access to formal banking had strengthened women’s economic independence and participation in development.

The President noted that more than 10 crore women associated with self-help groups were redefining grassroots development, contributing to livelihoods, entrepreneurship and local governance.

Referring to women’s representation in governance, Murmu said nearly 46% of elected representatives in Panchayati Raj institutions are women. She said the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam would take women’s political empowerment to a new level and reinforce the concept of women-led development.

She added that higher participation of women in electoral processes was strengthening democratic institutions and aligning with the constitutional vision of inclusive governance.

Tribal Welfare, Health And Education Initiatives

The President underscored a renewed focus on tribal welfare through programmes aimed at leadership development, healthcare and education. She referred to initiatives such as the Adi Karmayogi campaign, which seeks to nurture leadership potential within tribal communities.

Murmu said healthcare interventions under the National Sickle Cell Anaemia Elimination Mission had resulted in more than six crore screenings so far, addressing a major public health concern among tribal populations.

In education, she cited the role of Eklavya Model Residential Schools, where nearly 1.4 lakh students are currently enrolled, with many performing well in competitive examinations.

She also referred to targeted development programmes such as the Dharti Aaba Janajatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan and the PM-JANMAN Yojana, aimed at empowering tribal and particularly vulnerable tribal group (PVTG) communities.

Farmers, Food Security And Poverty Alleviation

Murmu described farmers as the backbone of India’s economy and cited the PM Kisan Samman Nidhi as a key initiative supporting agricultural households. She said priority was being given to fair pricing, affordable credit, insurance coverage, irrigation and access to modern farming practices.

On food security, the President highlighted the PM Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana, calling it the world’s largest scheme of its kind. The programme currently supports nearly 81 crore beneficiaries, ensuring food access for vulnerable populations.

She also referred to the construction of more than four crore pucca houses equipped with basic amenities, describing housing as a foundation for dignity and upward mobility among poor families.

Youth, Start-Ups And Skill Development

Highlighting India’s demographic strength, Murmu said government initiatives were increasingly focused on youth aspirations. She cited MY Bharat, also known as Mera Yuva Bharat, as a technology-driven platform connecting young citizens with opportunities in leadership, skill development and nation-building.

The President said the growth of India’s start-up ecosystem, largely driven by young entrepreneurs, was injecting innovation and global competitiveness into the economy.

Murmu said structural reforms such as the Goods and Services Tax had created a unified national market, while recent steps to streamline the GST framework would further strengthen economic integration. She also referred to the four labour codes, describing them as measures aimed at improving worker welfare while supporting enterprise growth.

She added that governance reforms focused on simplification, digital delivery and trust-based administration were narrowing the gap between citizens and the state.

Concluding her remarks, the President said these programmes collectively reflected an inclusive approach to development, combining welfare, empowerment and economic reform. She said public participation and effective implementation would be critical as India moves towards its goal of becoming a developed nation by 2047.

Republic Day Tomorrow: Share Some Quotable Quotes on The Day

Happy Republic Day!

As India celebrates the adoption of its Constitution tomorrow, here are some inspiring quotes from notable experts and leaders in fields like politics, law, science, and philosophy. here are some notable quotes that touch on themes of democracy, duty, freedom, and national unity.

  • “Constitution is not a mere lawyers document, it is a vehicle of Life, and its spirit is always the spirit of Age.” – B.R. Ambedkar (Architect of the Indian Constitution).

    “Every citizen of India must remember that he is an Indian and he has every right in this country but with certain duties.” – Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (India’s first Deputy Prime Minister).

  • “Democracy means nothing if people are not able to work the democracy for the common good.” – Jawaharlal Nehru (India’s first Prime Minister).
  • “In a democracy, the well-being, individuality and happiness of every citizen is important for the overall prosperity, peace, and happiness of the nation.” – A.P.J. Abdul Kalam (Former President of India).
  • “Freedom of mind is the real freedom. A person whose mind is not free, though he may not be in chains, is a slave, not a free man.” – B.R. Ambedkar.
  • “We are Indians, firstly and lastly.” – B.R. Ambedkar.
  • “Let a new India arise out of peasants’ cottages, grasping the plough, out of huts, cobbler, and sweeper.” – Swami Vivekananda.
  • “You must be the change you wish to see in the world.” – Mahatma Gandhi .
  • “The preservation of freedom is not the task of soldiers alone. The whole nation has to be strong.” – Lal Bahadur Shastri.
  • “Long years ago, we made a tryst with destiny, and now the time comes when we shall redeem our pledge, not wholly or in full measure, but very substantially. At the stroke of the midnight hour, when the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom.” – Jawaharlal Nehru.
  • “So long as you do not achieve social liberty, whatever freedom is provided by the law is of no avail to you.” – B.R. Ambedkar.
  • “Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high; where knowledge is free.” – Rabindranath Tagore.

Tech Giants Bet on Mini-Reactors to Power AI Boom

The relentless growth of artificial intelligence is creating an energy crisis of its own. To feed the staggering power demands of massive data centers, the technology industry is turning to a new, compact solution: small modular reactors, or SMRs.

These next-generation nuclear units represent a stark departure from the traditional, colossal power plants that can take a decade to build and require enormous upfront investment. Instead, SMRs are designed to be leaner, safer, and faster to deploy.

“These kinds of reactors have a small footprint and upgraded safety systems, and can be deployed in nearby industrial areas, including data centre campuses,” explained Rafael Mariano Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). He highlighted a key advantage for tech companies, noting they “don’t have to worry about regional grid supply constraints or transmission losses. This will be a decisive advantage in areas where grid upgrades are slow, and interconnection queues are long.”

While SMR technology is still advancing from research into real-world application, momentum is building. The IAEA is actively collaborating with global regulators and the nuclear industry to clear the path for widespread deployment. The goal is to see these smaller units operating in large numbers to meet surging electricity demands.

Google’s Nuclear Energy Pact

In a landmark move, Google has signed a pioneering agreement to purchase nuclear energy generated from multiple small modular reactor, a first-of-its-kind deal globally. If development stays on track, the reactors could be supplying clean power to Google’s operations by 2030.

Not content with terrestrial solutions alone, Google is also gazing skyward. The company is investigating the potential of space-based solar networks, which would use unfiltered solar energy in orbit to power large-scale machine learning operations. To test the concept, two prototype satellites are scheduled for launch in early 2027, where their radiation tolerance and data processing capabilities will be put to the test.

From restarting shuttered plants to constructing giant new reactors, and from betting on miniature atomic units to capturing sunlight in space, the strategies vary wildly. Yet energy experts observe that all these paths converge on the same inevitable conclusion: building a future-proof energy system capable of supporting advanced civilization will require a foundation built largely upon nuclear power.

Japan Launches High-Seas Gamble to Break China’s Grip on Critical Minerals

In a bold move to secure its economic future, Japan has dispatched a research ship on a pioneering mission to the depths of the Pacific Ocean. The goal: to test the viability of mining rare earth elements from the seabed, a high-stakes effort to loosen China’s commanding hold on these vital resources.

The deep-sea drilling vessel Chikyu set sail Monday from Shizuoka port, beginning a month-long expedition to waters near remote Minamitori Island, nearly 2,000 kilometers southeast of Tokyo. Its crew of 130 researchers and sailors will attempt a world-first feat: continuously lifting mineral-rich mud from a staggering six kilometers below the surface to test if the rare earths within can be practically recovered.

“For seven years, we have been preparing steadily for this. It is deeply moving to finally begin the confirmation tests,” said project leader Shoichi Ishii, speaking to Reuters as the ship departed against the iconic backdrop of Mount Fuji. “If this project succeeds, it will be of great significance in diversifying Japan’s rare earth resource procurement.”

A Mission Born of Strategic Urgency

The expedition is not merely a scientific endeavor; it is a direct response to growing geopolitical tensions. Japan’s urgency has intensified as Beijing tightens controls on exports of minerals with both civilian and military uses. Reports of broader restrictions on rare earth shipments to Japanese firms have added fuel to the fire, making resource security a top agenda item for global finance leaders.

Japan knows the cost of dependency firsthand. A 2010 diplomatic spat with China led to a sudden curtailment of rare earth exports, sending shockwaves through its high-tech manufacturing sector. Since then, Japan has halved its direct reliance on China from nearly 90% to about 60% by investing in overseas mines and boosting recycling.

Yet, the Minamitori project represents a more fundamental shift—the first serious attempt to establish a domestic source for these critical materials.

“The fundamental solution is to be able to produce rare earths inside Japan,” explained Takahide Kiuchi, an executive economist at Nomura Research Institute. He cautioned, however, that Japan remains almost completely dependent on China for certain heavy rare earths essential for technologies like electric vehicle motors.

A Long and Costly Road Ahead

Success is far from guaranteed. The Japanese government has already invested roughly 40 billion yen ($250 million) since 2018, with no production targets yet set and estimated reserves still undisclosed. If the current tests prove successful, a full-scale mining trial is tentatively scheduled for early 2027.

The economics remain a formidable hurdle. Seabed mining is notoriously expensive, though analysts note that sustained supply disruptions or sharply higher prices could eventually make the venture viable.

The venture is also being closely watched—and subtly challenged—by Beijing. During preliminary survey work last June, Chinese naval vessels operated near the research area, actions Ishii described as “intimidating.” China maintains its activities were lawful and has urged Japan not to “hype up threats.”

As the Chikyu steams toward its destination, it carries not just scientific equipment, but Japan’s hopes for a more secure and self-reliant technological future. The world will be watching to see if those hopes can be raised from the ocean floor.

Palestine Issue Dominates UNGA, Overshadowing Other Global Crises

The question of Palestine has taken centre stage at the United Nations, overshadowing the annual high-level week of the General Assembly where world leaders traditionally outline their global visions from the iconic green marble podium.

Even as wars rage in Ukraine and elsewhere, and the UN itself confronts crises on its 80th anniversary, the Palestinian statehood debate has seized the spotlight. A summit on Palestine is set for Monday, a day before the formal opening of the high-level session.

The momentum accelerated on Sunday when Britain and several other Western nations announced formal recognition of Palestine. France, co-convening Monday’s summit with Saudi Arabia, is expected to follow suit, joining 152 of the UN’s 193 member states — including India — that already recognise Palestinian statehood.

US Denies Visa to Palestine President

Yet, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas will not attend in person. The US denied him a visa, forcing the Assembly to vote on allowing him to speak remotely. In a striking show of support, 145 countries backed the move, with only the US, Israel and three others opposed, and six abstentions.

The strong endorsement reflects the growing tide of sympathy for Palestinians amid Israel’s offensive in Gaza, where nearly 75,000 people — most of them civilians — are reported killed. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has further inflamed tensions by vowing to expand Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

Still, the surge of recognition will remain largely symbolic. The US is expected to veto any Security Council bid for full UN membership, while Netanyahu appears unmoved by international censure.

Beneath the headlines, the UN faces its own existential questions. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres had hoped the 80th anniversary would spotlight his UN80 reform agenda, “Shifting Paradigms: United to Deliver”, which seeks to streamline the body’s work around peace and security, sustainable development and human rights. The official theme of this year’s high-level week, “Better Together: 80 Years and More for Peace, Development and Human Rights,” reflects that ambition.

ALSO READ: Canada, Australia and UK Recognise Palestine’s Statehood, Palestine Welcomes

But enthusiasm is tempered. The UN confronts a severe financial crunch, worsened by US President Donald Trump’s threat to cut Washington’s contributions, and global confidence in the institution has waned, a recent poll found only 58% of people worldwide still trust it.

Modi Skips This Year’s Gathering

Adding to the uncertainty, key global leaders, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, are skipping this year’s gathering.

By tradition, Brazil will open the debate, with President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva barely making it to New York after US visa complications hit members of his delegation. Trump will follow, also by tradition, and his speech is expected to set the tone, given his confrontational trade policies and geopolitical brinkmanship.

Meanwhile, real diplomacy will unfold on the sidelines, in bilateral and multilateral meetings aimed at navigating the increasingly unpredictable Trump era.

Representing India, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar began his diplomatic outreach on Sunday with a meeting with Philippine Foreign Secretary Theresa Lazaro. She later posted on X that the discussion “reaffirms our 2 countries’ commitment as Strategic Partners to actively develop cooperation in political, defence and security, the maritime domain, etc.”

As the General Assembly opens, the world’s attention may officially be on the UN’s 80th anniversary, but it is Palestine’s long-contested statehood that is commanding the spotlight.

Canada, Australia and UK Recognise Palestine’s Statehood, Palestine Welcomes

Palestine has hailed the coordinated move by Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom to formally recognise it as an independent and sovereign state, calling the decision a step in line with international law and legitimacy resolutions.

In a statement shared on X, Palestine’s Mission to the United Nations said its Ministry of Foreign Affairs “welcomes and expresses gratitude” to the three countries for what it described as “courageous decisions” that affirm the Palestinian right to statehood.

The recognition was announced on Sunday in synchronised declarations from Ottawa, Canberra and London, marking a significant diplomatic shift aimed at reviving prospects for a two-state solution in the Middle East.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, in a joint statement, said recognition was effective immediately and underscored Australia’s “longstanding commitment” to the two-state framework. “Australia recognises the legitimate and long-held aspirations of the people of Palestine to a state of their own,” they said, adding that the move was tied to international efforts to secure a Gaza ceasefire and the release of hostages taken during the October 7, 2023 attacks.

Palestine Authority pledges reforms

They stressed that the Palestinian Authority had renewed its recognition of Israel’s right to exist and pledged reforms in governance, elections, finance and education, while making clear that Hamas would have “no role in Palestine.”

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed that position in a video message, saying Britain’s recognition was intended to “revive the hope of peace for Palestinians and Israelis” and to lay the ground for renewed dialogue.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, in a statement, sharply criticised Israel’s current policies, accusing its government of systematically blocking Palestinian statehood through settlement expansion and a prolonged military campaign in Gaza. He said Canada’s recognition was rooted in “principles of self-determination and fundamental human rights” and aligned with Ottawa’s longstanding foreign policy traditions.

“This recognition is not a panacea,” Carney cautioned, “but it is a necessary step to preserve the possibility of a two-state solution and to help build the promise of a peaceful future for both Israel and Palestine.”

The joint move by three major Western powers is expected to intensify international pressure on Israel, which has consistently opposed recognition of Palestinian statehood outside a negotiated settlement.

The Great American Dream Now Carries a Steep Price Tag

The American dream, long pursued by Indian engineers and graduates, has suddenly become costlier. A new proclamation by US President Donald Trump has imposed a $100,000 annual surcharge on H-1B visa applications, sending shockwaves through India’s education and technology sectors.

The fee hike strikes hardest at early-career professionals. With median salaries for computer science graduates in the US ranging between $65,000 and $80,000, employers say the surcharge makes it unviable to sponsor young hires. Immigration experts warn approvals may now be limited to senior, high-value executives.

“Effectively, this closes the door for younger engineers who once formed the backbone of US tech companies,” said a New Delhi-based consultant. “The future Satya Nadellas or Sundar Pichais may never get the chance to begin that journey.”

India Bears the Brunt

Nearly 70% of all H-1B approvals go to Indian nationals, far ahead of other countries. Estimates suggest about 442,000 Indians currently hold these visas, mainly in software, data, and AI roles. Lawyers say the new levy acts as a filter, concentrating approvals among elite profiles at multinationals while squeezing out recruits from mid-tier outsourcing firms.

Education consultants in India report growing anxiety among families weighing the cost of US degrees with uncertain career pathways. IT giants, traditionally the largest H-1B sponsors, are now recalibrating staffing strategies. “Expect a pivot to offshore delivery hubs in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and even Mexico,” noted a Mumbai-based strategist.

A Gold Card for the Wealthy

In contrast, Trump has unveiled a “Gold Card” programme for wealthy foreigners. Those donating $1 million individually, or $2 million corporately, can secure expedited immigrant visas. Critics call it a system skewed toward the rich.

“This is meritocracy turned on its head,” said a Washington policy analyst. “The message is clear — the middle class faces barriers, while the wealthy can buy their way in.”

The administration defends the move citing job data. A Federal Reserve Bank of New York study showed unemployment rates of 6.1% among computer science graduates and 7.5% among computer engineering graduates aged 22–27 — double the rates in some non-technical fields. Underemployment, too, was high at over 16%.

Officials argue the US produces enough technical graduates and must prioritise domestic hiring. But industry leaders caution that layoffs and restructuring in 2023–24, coupled with AI-driven changes, have already reshaped demand. Companies still require talent but may now prefer to keep it offshore.

The H-1B pipeline has historically powered both corporate America and Indian aspirations. It gave US firms cost-efficient talent and helped create communities of Indian origin that flourished across industries. Analysts warn that shutting this route will choke the next generation of global leaders.

“A country that once opened its doors to talent is now signalling that opportunity is for the wealthy, not the aspiring,” said a senior Indian IT executive.

H-1B Fee To Apply Only For New Petitions, Not Renewals, Says White House

The White House has clarified that the newly announced $100,000 H-1B visa fee will apply only to fresh petitions, not to renewals or current visa holders. “This is a one-time fee that applies only to new visas. It will first be levied in the next lottery cycle,” a senior official told Indian media on Saturday.

White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said the intent was to curb misuse by firms filing mass petitions. “This action discourages spamming the system and ensures fairness for American workers,” she added.

President Donald Trump, who signed the proclamation on Friday, said the measure would ensure companies considered local talent first. “We need workers, we need great workers — and this ensures that,” he remarked.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick defended the steep cost, saying it would push firms to train domestic graduates instead of over-relying on foreign hires. “It’s just not economic to keep bringing in people when we have skilled graduates here,” he said.

The US issues about 85,000 new H-1B visas annually, with India-born professionals accounting for nearly three-fourths of approvals in 2023. The fee announcement has sparked unease in India’s IT industry, which depends heavily on the program to deploy skilled staff in the US. Experts warn the new costs may force firms to rethink business models or raise client fees.

GST 2.0 Rollout Leaves Key Categories Unchanged Despite Major Rate Overhaul

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) 2.0 regime, set to come into force on September 22, 2025, will bring sweeping changes to India’s indirect tax system, but several key items will remain untouched.

The 56th GST Council meeting, chaired by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, approved a restructuring of the tax slabs by merging the 12% and 28% brackets into two simplified rates of 5% and 18%. A new 40% de-merit slab has been created for luxury and sin goods, while essentials such as food staples will continue at a nil (0%) rate.

However, certain categories have been deliberately kept out of the reform. Precious metals such as gold, silver, and jewelry remain taxed at 3%, while items already aligned with the new structure, such as fresh produce at 0% and mobile phones at 18%, are unchanged. Sin goods like cigarettes, bidis, and chewing tobacco will continue under the existing 28% plus compensation cess until state borrowing obligations are cleared, delaying their eventual shift to 40%.

Essentials Hold Steady
Unpacked grains, milk, eggs, fruits, vegetables, salt, and sanitary napkins will continue to be exempt. “Maintaining the 0% slab for daily-use essentials ensures no additional burden is placed on lower-income households,” an official said, citing affordability as a key reason for stability.

Industry bodies have broadly welcomed the move. The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) described GST 2.0 as “a long-awaited simplification,” while the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) noted that unchanged rates on electronics and telecom services could limit the broader consumption stimulus.

Key Unchanged Items Under GST 2.0

Slab Item/Category Old Rate (%) New Rate (%)
0% Fresh fruits, vegetables, unpacked grains, milk, eggs, salt, sanitary napkins 0 0
3% Gold, silver, precious stones, jewelry 3 3
5% Sugar, tea, coffee (unpackaged), edible oils, spices (unpackaged), electric vehicles 5 5
18% Mobile phones, laptops, liquid handwashes, telecom services, banking services, hotel rooms above ₹7,500/night 18 18
28% + Cess Cigarettes, bidis, chewing tobacco, pan masala 28 + Cess 28 + Cess

Experts say the unchanged slabs reflect the government’s balancing act. While over 375 items are set to become cheaper from Monday, holding certain categories steady protects tax revenues. “This is a pragmatic approach. It brings relief for households without undermining state finances,” said a tax policy analyst.

Retailers expect the steady rates to keep prices predictable during the festive season. While reduced categories may drive consumer spending, unchanged rates on sin goods and gadgets ensure revenue streams remain intact.

However, billed as a “Diwali gift” for the middle class, GST 2.0 offers simplification and relief, even as debates continue over deferred hikes on tobacco and other de-merit products.

Trump’s $15 billion Clash With NYT Sets Off Another Legal Campaign For Newsrooms

When a sitting or former president elects to seek $15 billion in damages from a single news organisation, the action reads less like a conventional libel suit than like a strategic campaign play writ in legal form. On Sept. 15–16, 2025, Donald Trump announced and filed such a complaint against The New York Times, several Times journalists and associated publishers, saying the outlet had run a “decades-long campaign of lies” and calling it “one of the worst and most degenerate newspapers in the history of our country.”

He added that the paper had become a “virtual mouthpiece for the radical Left Democrat Party.” There are three discrete frames in which to judge this case: constitutional law, newsroom practice and political theatre. Each offers a different prediction about whether the suit is likely to prevail, and each suggests distinct consequences for the institutions at stake.

On paper, American defamation Law establishes a steep hill for public figures. Since New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), plaintiffs who are public officials or public figures must prove “actual malice” — that the defendant published a falsehood knowing it was false, or with reckless disregard for the truth. That standard protects all but the most egregious reporting failures and demands evidence about a reporter’s state of mind at publication, not merely proof of factual error. Courts have repeatedly emphasised the difficulty of meeting that bar.

That legal wall is why suits by powerful plaintiffs often operate as instruments of leverage rather than purely as mechanisms to vindicate reputations. Consider the recent settlements Trump highlights: ABC agreed to make a $15 million contribution to a planned Trump library to resolve a dispute tied to inaccurate on-air comments, and Paramount/ CBS reached a $16 million settlement in another high-profile dispute.

Those outcomes do not equate to judicial findings of malice; they reflect the complex calculus that companies make when weighing the costs of protracted discovery, reputational risk, and the distraction of litigation. In the commercial realpolitik of media companies, settlement can be damage control rather than an admission of journalistic failure.

From a newsroom vantage, the stakes are stark. Big-budget investigative journalism depends on an institutional ability to accept legal risk, to check sources, document reporting decisions, and defend editorial judgement in court if necessary. The threat of repeated, high-value suits imposes a chilling tax: even if most claims fail, the process of discovery, private depositions, the cost of legal defence, the drain on editors’ time,  can incentivise self-censorship or encourage settlements that leave public records unexplored.

As one experienced newsroom lawyer put it in recent commentary about litigation pressure, the pattern of “rhetoric and actions” from political leaders can be mirrored across the information ecosystem, prompting smaller outlets to mimic defensive strategies long before a case reaches a judge.

NYT Building

Yet it would be a mistake to view this litigation as an empty bluff. Courts are not wholly captive to First Amendment concerns; they adjudicate harms and damages on the basis of evidence. The complaint against the Times, as reported, identifies specific articles and a book project and alleges that their claims were published with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard.

If Trump’s legal team can produce contemporaneous internal communications, contradictory witness testimony, or other documentary proof that reporters knew key claims were false, the suit could survive early motions. But that is a high evidentiary bar, and historically judges have dismissed similar high-stakes suits at early procedural stages when plaintiffs fail to plead facts that plausibly demonstrate actual malice.

The litigation is also a political communication. Publicising a multi-billion dollar suit amplifies a message: that major institutions are corrupt, that the plaintiff is under siege, and that legal action is evidence of fighting back. This is a form of signalling to a base that prizes grievance and retribution. As one commentator put it in an earlier Trump-era legal contest, some suits are “cartoonishly vexatious,” — not because they cannot be argued, but because their primary utility is to shift the news cycle and impose costs on opponents.

The lesson is twofold: litigation can be weaponised by the powerful, and legal doctrine (even a robust Sullivan standard) does not eliminate the practical asymmetry that comes with litigation’s cost and duration. Two other practical anchors should guide readers watching this case. First, the forum selection, filing in Florida, and it matters. Plaintiffs sometimes choose jurisdictions they perceive as more favorable or predictable; venue can affect pretrial orders and scheduling. Second, discovery will be decisive.

If the Times shows meticulous sourcing, contemporaneous notes, and editorial review that produced its stories, it strengthens its defence. Conversely, if the plaintiff can point to internal inconsistencies at the Times or to documentary proof of knowing falsehoods, the case could survive motions to dismiss.

ALSO READ: Trump Slaps $15 Billion Suit on NYT, Calls Daily ‘Degenerative’

However, there are immediate consequences. If courts reject overreaching suits and insist on the actual-malice standard, that outcome will protect the breathing room journalists need to pursue investigations. Instead, if high-value suits proceed on amorphous proofs and culminate in settlements, the result will be a more cautionary press, especially among mid-sized outlets without the Times’ legal resources.

Finally, Mr. Trump’s Truth Social post supplies the rhetorical raw material for the complaint. “The New York Times has been allowed to freely lie, smear, and defame me for far too long,” he wrote in his social media platform but rhetoric does not equal evidence. The coming months of motions, discovery and possible appeals will test whether the complaint is primarily performative or backed by the documentary and testimonial proof that the American law requires.

For now, newsrooms should do what they have always done when under legal pressure: document rigorously, be transparent about sourcing where possible, and explain to readers how and why reporting decisions were made. Courts will determine whether a legal line has been crossed or not. Editors must defend the sturdier, day-to-day work of truth-seeking journey that makes their determination possible.

Trump Slaps $15 Billion Suit on NYT, Calls Daily ‘Degenerative’

US President Donald Trump has announced a sweeping $15 billion defamation and libel suit against The New York Times, accusing the paper of running a “decades-long campaign of lies” and smearing him, his family, businesses, and political movement.

Posting on his Truth Social platform, Trump branded the newspaper “one of the most degenerative” in American history, alleging it had effectively become a “mouthpiece for the radical Left Democrat Party.” He also claimed its coverage of Democratic rival Kamala Harris amounted to “the single largest illegal campaign contribution ever.”

Trump said the suit, filed in Florida, aims to hold The Times accountable in the same way he had “successfully litigated” against other outlets. He cited earlier settlements with ABC/Disney and CBS/Paramount, which reportedly paid multimillion-dollar sums to the Trump Library project following disputes over their coverage.

ALSO READ: London’s Far-Right Rally Sends Shockwaves Through South Asian Communities

This is not Trump’s first legal confrontation with the media. He has long branded critical coverage as “fake news,” but in recent years has escalated to high-value lawsuits. Earlier settlements, though not publicly verified by courts, have been presented by Trump as victories, strengthening his narrative of being unfairly targeted by mainstream outlets.

Legal experts, however, note that US defamation law sets a high bar for public figures, requiring proof of “actual malice.” Historically, similar suits, including Trump’s own 2020 case against The New York Times over Russia probe coverage, were dismissed. Analysts suggest the current lawsuit may be as much a political move to energize his base as a legal strategy.

Indian Context

Comparisons can be drawn to Indian political and media tussles, where defamation suits are also wielded as tools to counter negative coverage. In 2016, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal faced a string of defamation cases filed by political rivals, many of which were later withdrawn after publicised apologies, underscoring how such legal battles often play out more in the court of public opinion than in law.

As the US heads deeper into the election season, Trump’s litigation blitz against media outlets signals an aggressive campaign tactic — one that blurs the lines between courtroom strategy and political messaging.

SC Declines Blanket Stay on Waqf Amendment Act, Grants Limited Relief

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to impose a blanket stay on the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, while granting limited interim relief on contentious provisions. A bench led by Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai, along with Justice A.G. Masih, stressed that courts must exercise restraint when asked to suspend laws passed by Parliament.

“By now, it is a settled principle of law that the courts should be very slow in granting interim relief by way of staying the provisions of an enactment,” the bench observed, underlining that such orders can only be issued in “rare and exceptional cases.” The court, therefore, rejected the plea seeking a blanket stay on the Act’s implementation.

Limited Relief on Select Clauses

Among its interim directions, the court stayed the requirement that only a person “professing Islam for at least five years” could create a waqf, until state governments frame rules to determine the criteria. The bench also restricted the powers of designated officers under Section 3C, directing that no third-party rights can be created over disputed properties until their status is finally determined by tribunals.

On the issue of representation, the bench capped non-Muslim membership in the Central Waqf Council at four out of 22 members and in State Waqf Boards at three out of 11. It also advised, though without mandating, that Chief Executive Officers of Waqf Boards should, “as far as possible,” be appointed from within the Muslim community.

The court, however, refrained from intervening in the controversial deletion of the “waqf by user” provision, noting that custodians (mutawallis) who failed to register waqf properties for over a century cannot now demand exemptions. “If the legislature… finds that on account of the concept of ‘Waqf by User’, huge government properties have been encroached upon and to stop the said menace it takes steps for deletion, the said amendment prima facie cannot be said to be arbitrary,” the bench said.

Key Provisions Upheld

The Supreme Court also declined to stay Section 3D, which nullifies claims declaring protected monuments as waqf properties. The provision was enacted after the Archaeological Survey of India flagged difficulties in preserving monuments due to overlapping claims. The bench pointed out that the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, already safeguards customary religious practices at such monuments.

Similarly, Section 3E, which bars declaring land in Scheduled or Tribal areas as waqf property, was upheld. The bench said the provision has a “clear nexus” with its objective of safeguarding the interests of tribal communities, describing them as “one of the most marginalised and vulnerable sections of our country.”

The court clarified that its observations were made only for the limited purpose of deciding interim relief and will not prejudice final arguments on the Act’s constitutional validity.

Challenge to the Law

The petitions, filed by several organisations and individuals, had argued that the amendments were unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 15, 25, 26, 29 and 30, alleging that the law’s real intent was to “expropriate waqf properties” under the guise of regulation. The Union government, however, defended the amendments, insisting they were designed to prevent misuse, protect waqf assets, and bring greater transparency in management.

After hearing arguments over three sittings, the Supreme Court reserved its order before issuing Monday’s ruling, which marks a setback for petitioners seeking an immediate halt to the law.

Emmy Awards 2025: Colbert Gets Emotional Farewell; Adolescence, The Studio, The Pitt Dominate

Los Angeles, Sept 14: The 77th Primetime Emmy Awards turned into a night of surprises, historic wins and emotional moments as Adolescence, The Studio, The Pitt, and The Late Show With Stephen Colbert emerged as the biggest winners.

The limited series Adolescence led the tally with six awards, including Best Limited or Anthology Series. Stephen Graham won Best Actor, while young star Owen Cooper made history as the youngest-ever male Emmy winner with his supporting role. Erin Doherty also bagged Best Supporting Actress, with Philip Barantini and Graham-Jack Thorne duo recognized for directing and writing respectively.

Comedy belonged to Seth Rogen’s The Studio, which won Best Comedy Series, alongside trophies for Best Actor, Best Directing, and Best Writing. Jean Smart further solidified her legacy with Best Actress in a Comedy Series for Hacks, while her co-star Hannah Einbinder earned Best Supporting Actress. In a major upset, Jeff Hiller claimed Best Supporting Actor in a Comedy for Somebody Somewhere, beating veteran nominee Harrison Ford.

Drama gold went to The Pitt, crowned Best Drama Series, with Noah Wyle winning Best Actor and Katherine LaNasa scoring a surprise victory for Best Supporting Actress. Severance also celebrated, with Britt Lower taking Best Actress and Tramell Tillman making history as the first Black man to win Supporting Actor in a Drama. Adam Randall won directing honors for Slow Horses.

In variety and talk categories, Stephen Colbert’s recently canceled The Late Show won Best Talk Series, receiving a thunderous standing ovation. John Oliver’s Last Week Tonight outshone SNL to claim Best Scripted Variety Series and Best Writing for a Variety Series, though SNL50: The Anniversary Special secured the Best Live Variety Special.

Cristin Milioti won Best Actress in a Limited Series for The Penguin, while The Traitors triumphed as Best Reality Competition Program. The ceremony also featured reunions, tributes, and an In Memoriam led by Phylicia Rashad.

Hosted by Nate Bargatze at LA’s Peacock Theater, the show celebrated both fresh talent and industry veterans, leaving audiences with memorable firsts and farewells in Emmy history.

Emmy Awards 2025- Complete List of Winners:

Best Drama SeriesThe Pitt
Best Comedy SeriesThe Studio
Best Limited or Anthology SeriesAdolescence
Best Reality Competition ProgramThe Traitors
Best Talk SeriesThe Late Show With Stephen Colbert
Best Scripted Variety SeriesLast Week Tonight With John Oliver
Best Variety Special (Live)SNL50: The Anniversary Special

Best Actor in a Drama Series – Noah Wyle, The Pitt
Best Actress in a Drama Series – Britt Lower, Severance
Best Supporting Actor in a Drama Series – Tramell Tillman, Severance
Best Supporting Actress in a Drama Series – Katherine LaNasa, The Pitt

Best Actor in a Comedy Series – Seth Rogen, The Studio
Best Actress in a Comedy Series – Jean Smart, Hacks
Best Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series – Jeff Hiller, Somebody Somewhere
Best Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series – Hannah Einbinder, Hacks

Best Actor in a Limited or Anthology Series or Movie – Stephen Graham, Adolescence
Best Actress in a Limited or Anthology Series or Movie – Cristin Milioti, The Penguin
Best Supporting Actor in a Limited or Anthology Series or Movie – Owen Cooper, Adolescence
Best Supporting Actress in a Limited or Anthology Series or Movie – Erin Doherty, Adolescence

Best Writing for a Drama Series – Dan Gilroy, Andor
Best Writing for a Comedy Series – Seth Rogen, Evan Goldberg & team, The Studio
Best Writing for a Limited or Anthology Series or Movie – Jack Thorne & Stephen Graham, Adolescence
Best Writing for a Variety SeriesLast Week Tonight With John Oliver

Best Directing for a Drama Series – Adam Randall, Slow Horses
Best Directing for a Comedy Series – Seth Rogen, The Studio
Best Directing for a Limited or Anthology Series or Movie – Philip Barantini, Adolescence

London’s Far-Right Rally Sends Shockwaves Through South Asian Communities

London witnessed one of its most dramatic confrontations between far-right activists and anti-racism campaigners in recent memory this weekend. A march led by Tommy Robinson, founder of the English Defence League, drew an estimated 110,000 to 150,000 supporters, marking it as one of the largest right-wing gatherings in decades.

While organizers claimed even higher turnout, the rally descended into violence, leaving 26 police officers injured, four seriously, and 25 protesters arrested. For South Asians in the UK, who make up one of the country’s largest ethnic minority blocs, the violent rhetoric and size of the rally raise fresh concerns about rising hate crimes, and their identity of belonging.

The event, branded the “Unite the Kingdom” march, was celebrated by Robinson as a “tidal wave of patriotism.” Yet for many observers, the gathering was less about unity and more about exclusion. Anti-immigrant chants, placards criticizing multiculturalism, and speeches targeting Muslim communities made clear the undercurrent of hostility.

ALSO READ: Massive Anti-Immigration Rally in London Turns Violent, 26 Police Officers Injured

South Asians, particularly Muslims of Pakistani and Bangladeshi heritage, were indirectly placed in the crosshairs of this rhetoric. The clash between Robinson’s supporters and counter-protesters organized by Stand Up to Racism only deepened the sense that Britain’s immigrant communities are caught in the middle of an escalating ideological battle.

The South Asian footprint in the UK

According to the 2021 Census (ONS), South Asians form about 9.3% of the population in England and Wales. The breakdown highlights their importance in Britain’s demographic fabric:

  • Indian-origin population: ~1.86 million (3.1%).

  • Pakistani-origin population: ~1.59 million (2.7%).

  • Bangladeshi-origin population: ~0.6 million (1.0%).

  • Sri Lankan, Nepali and other South Asians: collectively ~0.3 million.

These communities are not just statistically significant; they are deeply woven into Britain’s social, cultural, and economic life. Indians form the backbone of the NHS’s medical workforce, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis drive the retail, hospitality, and transport sectors, while newer groups like Nepalis contribute heavily to service and defense.

The London rally revives memories of earlier flashpoints when South Asians became targets of xenophobia. Hate crime data from the Home Office shows a persistent rise in racially and religiously motivated offenses, with spikes often following political events such as Brexit or terror attacks. In 2022–23, police recorded over 109,000 hate crimes, with nearly 70% related to race.

South Asians, especially Muslims and Sikhs who are often mistakenly identified as Muslims, report a heightened sense of vulnerability after such rallies. Grassroots organizations warn that even when physical violence is limited, the psychological toll of being depicted as outsiders can erode trust in institutions and fray inter-community ties.

Generational divides: Young South Asians feel the heat

Second- and third-generation South Asians in Britain are often proud to identify as both British and Asian. However, far-right mobilizations complicate that identity. University campuses have seen rising incidents of racial harassment, and South Asian students often bear the brunt of verbal abuse in public spaces.

Gen-Z South Asians in London spoke on social media about avoiding certain neighborhoods during the rally and expressed anger at being indirectly portrayed as incompatible with Britishness. This sentiment echoes findings from the British Social Attitudes Survey, which noted that younger minorities increasingly feel less secure about their status in society compared to a decade ago.

The rally also arrives at a politically sensitive moment with elections looming in the UK, where immigration is again a headline issue. Far-right rhetoric influences mainstream parties, pushing them to adopt stricter stances on asylum and border control.

Rishi Sunauk with Indian PM Narendra Modi

South Asian communities, however, are no longer passive observers. They represent influential voting blocs in constituencies across London, Birmingham, Leicester, and Manchester. Indian-origin politicians like Rishi Sunak, the former Prime Minister, and several Labour MPs of Pakistani and Bangladeshi origin reflect this growing political clout. But, many community leaders worry that rallies like Robinson’s could polarize voters further, hardening stereotypes and complicating their engagement with both major parties.

A global echo chamber

The London march did not exist in a vacuum. Elon Musk’s video address to the rally, criticizing Britain’s political class and invoking free speech anxieties—gave it international attention. Experts warn that far-right groups across Europe and North America are increasingly coordinated, sharing slogans, strategies, and even celebrity endorsements.

For South Asians, this global networking of extremist rhetoric is alarming. Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi diaspora communities in the U.S. and Canada have already faced the spillover effects of anti-immigrant sentiment. Analysts fear that what starts on London’s streets can embolden similar rhetoric abroad, further tightening the pressure on immigrant communities.

ALSO READ: U.S. Immigration Policy Shift: No Renewal for Humanitarian ‘Migrant Parole’ Program

Despite anxieties, South Asian communities have demonstrated resilience in the face of hostility. Community organizations, interfaith groups, and student associations mobilized rapidly during the London rally, ensuring counter-demonstrations remained visible and peaceful.

Several South Asian MPs condemned the violence, while business leaders highlighted the economic contributions of migrants. The NHS, universities, and city councils used the moment to reaffirm the importance of diversity in sustaining Britain’s institutions.

The London rally was framed by organizers as an assertion of patriotism, but for Britain’s South Asians, it was a stark reminder that questions of belonging are far from settled. While the community has built a visible and influential presence across sectors, the persistence of far-right mobilization threatens to undo decades of integration.

For now, South Asians are cautiously navigating rising hostility while shaping Britain’s future through political engagement, cultural leadership, and economic dynamism. As one activist in Leicester put it after the rally: “They want us out, but Britain cannot run without us.”

Massive Anti-Immigration Rally in London Turns Violent, 26 Police Officers Injured

London witnessed one of its largest far-right demonstrations in recent memory on Saturday, as a march led by activist Tommy Robinson spiraled into violence, leaving at least 26 police officers injured and resulting in 25 arrests.

According to the Metropolitan Police, clashes erupted when sections of Robinson’s supporters attempted to push through barriers separating them from a counter-protest organized by the group Stand Up to Racism. Officers were reportedly punched, kicked, and struck with bottles before riot police were dispatched to regain control.

Authorities confirmed that four officers sustained serious injuries, including broken teeth, a concussion, a suspected broken nose, and a spinal injury. Reinforcements carrying riot shields and helmets were rushed to the scene to contain escalating tensions.

Crowd estimates placed attendance at between 110,000 and 150,000, making it one of the biggest far-right gatherings in the UK in recent years. Organizers, however, claimed turnout was even higher, branding it the “Unite the Kingdom” march. Robinson hailed the event as a “tidal wave of patriotism” and described it as the beginning of a “cultural revolution.”

Robinson, born Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is the founder of the nationalist and anti-Islam English Defence League. He has long been a controversial figure in British politics and remains one of the most prominent voices on the UK’s far-right.

The rally drew prominent figures from across Europe’s far-right networks and even saw a surprise video address from billionaire Elon Musk. In his message, Musk criticized Britain’s political leadership, argued that citizens were “scared to exercise their free speech,” and urged a push for political change.

Police said more than 1,600 officers were deployed across London to manage the rally, which coincided with several other major public events including football matches and concerts. Authorities confirmed that investigations into the violence were underway and that additional arrests were likely.

‘We Don’t Take Part In Wars’: China Reacts Sharply After Trump’s NATO Tariff Call

China has strongly rejected US President Donald Trump’s proposal that NATO members impose steep tariffs on Beijing, saying such measures would only worsen global tensions.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi made the remarks on Saturday during a press conference in Ljubljana, Slovenia, following talks with Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon. His comments came just hours after Trump suggested NATO should consider tariffs of 50–100 per cent on Chinese goods until the war in Ukraine ends.

“China does not participate in or plan wars, and what China does is to encourage peace talks and promote political settlement of hotspot issues through dialogue,” Wang was quoted as saying by China Daily.

Wang argued that sanctions and tariffs would not resolve crises but only complicate them further. “China and Europe should be friends rather than rivals, and should cooperate rather than confront each other,” he said. “Making the right choices amid the greatest changes in a century demonstrates the responsibilities that both sides should fulfill towards history and the people.”

Wang also stressed that Beijing remains committed to multilateralism and the principles of the UN Charter, adding that the current international situation was defined by “intertwined chaos and continuous conflicts.”

Ukraine war with Russia

Trump, in a post on his Truth Social platform, had said NATO should take collective action on tariffs: “I believe that this, plus NATO, as a group, placing 50 per cent to 100 per cent TARIFFS ON CHINA, to be fully withdrawn after the WAR with Russia and Ukraine is ended, will also be of great help in ENDING this deadly, but RIDICULOUS, WAR.”

The former president claimed China maintains “a strong control, and even grip, over Russia,” suggesting punitive tariffs would weaken Beijing’s leverage over Moscow.

Trump’s proposal is unusual because NATO is a military alliance with no mandate on trade issues. Analysts say his idea of collective tariffs under NATO reflects a broadening of security tools into the economic sphere.

Earlier this month, Trump had accused Chinese President Xi Jinping of “conspiring against” the United States after Beijing held its largest-ever military parade on September 3, attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. However, in a subsequent remark, Trump said his personal relationship with Xi was still “very good,” underscoring his oscillating stance towards Beijing.

China’s Consistent Refrain on Tariffs

Wang Yi’s latest remarks echo Beijing’s long-standing response to US tariff threats. Since the onset of Trump’s trade war in 2018, China has consistently positioned itself as a supporter of global free trade and multilateral cooperation, while rejecting what it calls Washington’s “unilateral protectionism.”

During earlier rounds of tariffs on Chinese goods, Beijing responded with targeted counter-tariffs but avoided escalating rhetoric, often reiterating that dialogue and mutual respect should guide US-China relations. For instance, in 2019 when Trump raised duties on $200 billion worth of imports, Chinese officials said the “only way forward is cooperation, not confrontation,” while rolling out measured relief for domestic exporters.

China’s playbook has also involved appealing to Europe and other global partners. Wang’s emphasis in Ljubljana that “China and Europe should be friends rather than rivals” reflects Beijing’s strategy of preventing Washington from rallying its allies into a united front against China. This mirrors past efforts when Beijing sought closer ties with the EU even as US tariffs intensified.

The rhetoric of “peace talks” and “multilateralism” serves a dual purpose: projecting China as a responsible power amid global instability, and contrasting Beijing’s image with Washington’s protectionist posture. At the same time, China has been careful not to openly distance itself from Russia, maintaining energy imports and high-level diplomacy while rejecting suggestions that it is actively fueling the war in Ukraine.

If NATO were to adopt Trump’s proposed tariff scheme, unlikely though it may be, China would almost certainly respond with both diplomatic protests and retaliatory economic measures, just as it did during the first trade war. For now, Wang Yi’s remarks suggest Beijing will continue its balancing act: opposing punitive measures, promoting dialogue, and seeking to court European partners wary of being drawn into Washington’s hardening stance.

Gold Nears Record Highs of ₹1.13 Lakh: Check Where Will It Be By Year-End

Gold prices are once again dominating global headlines. Hovering near all-time highs, the yellow metal has emerged as one of the most closely watched assets this September, reflecting a mix of investor anxiety, central bank policies, and domestic demand surges in India ahead of the festive season. From Wall Street to Chandni Chowk, gold’s rally is shaping markets and household budgets alike.

The U.S. Federal Reserve remains the single most important influence on gold’s trajectory. Global spot prices touched US$3,673.95 per ounce earlier this week, just shy of fresh records, before consolidating around US$3,648–3,650. Weakness in the U.S. labor market, including higher jobless claims and downward revisions in non-farm payrolls, has reinforced expectations that the Fed could cut rates in its next policy meetings.

For gold investors, this matters because lower interest rates reduce the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset like bullion. A weaker U.S. dollar also typically drives up international gold demand. As a result, bullion is increasingly seen as a hedge against both financial uncertainty and inflationary risks that remain sticky across major economies.

India’s Record-High Prices

In India, the world’s second-largest consumer of gold after China, the impact is immediate. Domestic gold prices have crossed ₹1,09,000 per 10 grams in key markets, with Delhi witnessing trades as high as ₹1,13,100 per 10 grams. Prices in Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, and Bengaluru are only marginally lower, averaging around ₹11,050–11,070 per gram for 24-carat gold. Even 22-carat gold, traditionally preferred for jewellery, now costs over ₹10,100 per gram.

The surge is pinching consumers but also fueling speculative interest. Jewellers report that buyers are cautious about bulk purchases, yet cultural factors, particularly weddings and festivals, ensure that demand does not collapse. Many households continue to view gold as both ornament and insurance, a long-standing tradition that resists market cycles.

Drivers Of The Rally

The current gold rally rests on five pillars:

  1. Global Monetary Policy: Expectations of Fed rate cuts are the biggest driver, but central banks worldwide are also increasing their gold reserves, adding to demand.

  2. Geopolitical Tensions: Uncertainty in regions from Eastern Europe to East Asia has pushed investors toward safe-haven assets.

  3. Inflationary Concerns: While consumer inflation in the U.S. and Europe has moderated, it remains above target in many regions, preserving gold’s appeal as an inflation hedge.

  4. Weaker Dollar: Any slide in the U.S. currency makes gold more affordable for buyers in other countries, reinforcing global flows.

  5. Indian Festive Demand: The upcoming Navratri, Dhanteras, and wedding season ensures a domestic consumption boost, regardless of price levels.

Market Volatility And Risks

Despite the bullish undertone, analysts caution that volatility is inevitable. Profit-taking is evident whenever gold hits a new high. The key risk lies in inflation cooling faster than expected. If price pressures ease and the Fed slows or limits its rate cuts, gold could lose momentum. A stronger dollar in such a scenario would likely pull bullion back to the US$3,450–3,500 per ounce range.

Domestically, government policy also poses a risk. Import duties on gold remain steep, and any further tweaks by New Delhi to curb imports could alter pricing dynamics. The rupee’s performance against the dollar will also play a role in determining how global prices translate into domestic rates.

India’s listed jewellers have reacted swiftly to soaring gold prices. Shares of Titan, Kalyan Jewellers, and Senco Gold have seen heightened trading volumes. While high prices can dampen near-term consumer purchases, the larger narrative is supportive for organised retail chains. Analysts argue that customers are likely to prefer branded outlets that offer exchange schemes, certified quality, and buy-back assurances in times of price volatility.

Scenario-Based Year-End Forecast

Looking ahead, analysts outline three possible scenarios for gold by December 2025:

  1. Aggressive Fed Rate Cuts
    If the Fed slashes rates by 50–75 basis points before year-end, gold could easily breach US$3,750–3,800 per ounce. In India, this translates to ₹1,15,000–1,18,000 per 10 grams, depending on rupee levels and duties.

  2. Gradual Easing
    A modest 25-basis-point cut or a more cautious Fed stance would keep gold range-bound. Spot prices may hover between US$3,600–3,700 per ounce, with Indian rates consolidating in the ₹1,09,000–1,13,000 per 10 grams range.

  3. Cooling Inflation
    If inflation drops sharply, easing the need for aggressive cuts, gold could retreat to US$3,450–3,500 per ounce. Domestic prices could slide back to ₹1,03,000–1,05,000 per 10 grams.

Current Gold Prices In Major Indian Cities

As of mid-September 2025, here are the prevailing gold rates across five major Indian metros:

  • Delhi: ~₹11,130 (24-carat per gram), ~₹10,205 (22-carat), ~₹8,352 (18-carat)

  • Mumbai: ~₹11,050–11,060 (24-carat), ~₹10,130–10,145 (22-carat), ~₹8,280–8,300 (18-carat)

  • Chennai: ~₹11,070 (24-carat), ~₹10,150 (22-carat), ~₹8,400 (18-carat)

  • Kolkata: ~₹11,051 (24-carat), ~₹10,130 (22-carat), ~₹8,288 (18-carat)

  • Bengaluru: ~₹11,051 (24-carat), ~₹10,130 (22-carat), ~₹8,288 (18-carat)

These figures underline the sharp escalation in costs across the board. For perspective, gold was trading below ₹60,000 per 10 grams barely two years ago.

For global and Indian investors alike, the lesson is clear: chasing highs is risky, but ignoring gold altogether could prove costly in uncertain times. Market experts recommend staggered buying, accumulating during pullbacks rather than entering at peaks.

In fact, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and sovereign gold bonds provide safer avenues for exposure without the storage and purity concerns of physical bullion.

Why Speculative Fever Always Catches Up

Gold’s surge reflects more than speculative fever. It embodies anxiety about the global economy, inflation, and geopolitical tensions, while also highlighting India’s enduring cultural affinity for the metal.

Yet, the rally’s sustainability rests on forces beyond any single market’s control. The U.S. Fed’s choices, global inflation trends, and currency shifts will dictate whether 2025 ends with gold at dazzling new records or retreating from its highs.

For now, one thing is certain: gold is once again reminding the world why it has been the ultimate store of value for centuries.

Dalai Lama Extends Greetings To Sushila Karki On Becoming Nepal’s Interim Prime Minister

Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, on Saturday congratulated Sushila Karki on her appointment as the interim Prime Minister of Nepal, hailing her elevation as historic.

Karki, 73, who earlier served as Nepal’s first woman Chief Justice, was sworn in as the country’s first woman Prime Minister late Friday, taking charge after a week of political turbulence.

In a message released by his office, the Dalai Lama said the people of Tibet and Nepal shared long-standing ties of friendship. He recalled Kathmandu’s role in hosting Tibetan refugees after the 1959 uprising and lauded their contribution to Nepal’s economy despite being a small community.

“I wish you every success in fulfilling the hopes and aspirations of the people of Nepal in these challenging times. With my prayers and good wishes,” the Dalai Lama’s statement said, while noting Nepal’s progress in improving the lives of its poor and marginalized sections.

Karki’s appointment came after the resignation of K P Sharma Oli, whose government was toppled earlier this week amid massive Gen-Z-led protests against corruption and nepotism. Activists on the streets had rallied behind Karki, rejecting other non-political names that were floated for the post.

The unrest had also disrupted the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra for several Indian pilgrims stranded in Tibet via Nepal. With border points reopening on Thursday, their passage has now resumed, officials confirmed.

Pope Francis Dies Aged 88, World Leaders Mourn

  • Pope Francis, leader of the Roman Catholic Church, has passed away at 88 due to respiratory ailments. World leaders, including Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, have expressed their condolences.

The world is in mourning as Pope Francis, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church, has passed away at the age of 88. The Vatican announced his death, which occurred at his residence in the Vatican’s Casa Santa Marta. The Pope had been battling respiratory ailments and pneumonia, which ultimately led to his demise.

Cardinal Kevin Farrell, in an announcement on the Vatican’s TV channel, expressed the profound sadness felt by the global Catholic community. “Dear brothers and sisters, it is with profound sadness I must announce the death of our Holy Father Francis,” he said.

Pope Francis, born Jorge Mario Bergoglio, had a long history of respiratory issues. In his early 20s, he underwent surgery in his native Argentina to remove a portion of his lung affected by a severe respiratory infection. As he aged, he frequently suffered bouts of respiratory illnesses, even cancelling a planned visit to the United Arab Emirates in November 2023 due to influenza and lung inflammation.

The Pope’s final days were marked by his unwavering commitment to his duties. On Easter Sunday morning, he had a brief private meeting with the Vice President of the United States of America, J D Vance. The Vice President was travelling to Italy with his family and visited the Secretariat of State before leaving for India.

World Leaders Express Condolences

Pope Francis’ death has sent ripples across the globe, with leaders expressing their condolences. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had previously admired the Pope’s commitment to serving people, expressed his sorrow. He fondly recalled his meetings with the Pope and praised his commitment to inclusive and all-round development.

The Pope’s death also marks the end of an era in the Vatican’s history. He was the first Pope from the Southern Hemisphere and the first Jesuit Pope. His papacy was marked by his commitment to the poor and marginalized, and his efforts to reform the Church’s approach to social issues.

Pope Francis had requested that his funeral rites be simplified and focused on expressing the faith of the Church in the Risen Body of Christ. This request reflects his lifelong commitment to humility and service. The funeral Mass, guided by the liturgical book for papal funeral rites that Pope Francis himself approved in April 2024, has yet to be announced.

Legacy of Pope Francis

The Pope’s death is a significant event in the history of the Catholic Church. The last time a Pope passed away was in 2005, when Pope John Paul II died after a long illness. His death led to a period of mourning in the Catholic Church, similar to what is expected following the death of Pope Francis.

The world leaders have expressed their condolences and shared their memories of the Pope. Vice President J D Vance, who had a brief private meeting with Pope Francis on Easter Sunday, expressed his sorrow and shared a homily the Pope gave in the early days of COVID.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese highlighted Pope Francis’ closeness to the people of Australia and his role as a devoted champion for Australian Catholics.

European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon also expressed their condolences. They highlighted Pope Francis’ humility, love for the less fortunate, and unwavering commitment to the vulnerable.

Indian Market Makes Historic Recovery, Investors Gain Rs 10.9 Lakh Crore

In an unprecedented turn of events, the Indian stock market made a remarkable recovery on Tuesday, April 15, as investors regained a colossal Rs 10.9 lakh crore in a single day. This recovery effectively wiped out the losses incurred following the US tariff shock on April 2, marking a significant milestone in the financial sector.

The Sensex, a benchmark index of the Bombay Stock Exchange, witnessed a surge of over 1,570 points, while the Nifty, the National Stock Exchange’s benchmark index, soared past the 22,300 mark. This marked one of the most substantial gains in recent months, reflecting a robust and resilient market.

The Broad-Based Recovery and Its Drivers

This recovery was not limited to a specific sector or a handful of stocks. Instead, it was broad-based, encompassing various sectors and indices. The driving force behind this rally was a combination of strong investor sentiment, positive global cues, and domestic optimism. The primary catalyst for this rally was a significant update on US trade policy.

The US administration announced a 90-day delay in tariffs for most countries, with the notable exception of China. This announcement served to calm investor nerves and reignite hopes for India’s position in global supply chains.

Financial stocks, due to their heavy weightage in the indices, led the charge, rising over 2 per cent. The midcap and smallcap indices, which had been underperforming recently, also saw a strong recovery, each rising by around 3 per cent. Market experts noted that domestic institutional investors turned aggressive buyers on Tuesday, further supporting the upward momentum. Asian markets were also firm, supported by a weaker US dollar and stable bond yields, giving Indian markets an additional boost as they reopened after an extended weekend.

India’s Position Amid Tariff War

India’s strong macroeconomic fundamentals continue to attract investor interest, apart from global cues. With robust domestic demand and limited direct exposure to US-China tensions, India is increasingly seen as a stable bet amid global uncertainties, market experts noted. While data on foreign institutional investor flows is yet to be released, early signs point to strong buying activity.

“Markets are adjusting the new reality of daily Trump twists and turns,” said Vikas Gupta, CEO and Chief Investment Strategist at OmniScience Capital. He added that sometimes when tariffs look like they have been temporarily removed, the markets will react positively, when something unexpected happens they will react negatively.